[Model investigations of the impedance effectiveness conerning bacterial relevant to food hygiene].

J Schulenburg, T Bergann
{"title":"[Model investigations of the impedance effectiveness conerning bacterial relevant to food hygiene].","authors":"J Schulenburg,&nbsp;T Bergann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impedance technique mostly meets today's requirements of microbiological rapid methods. At relatively high prime cost for the equipment the advantages are marked by low personnel and material costs as well as swiftness combined with highly flexible usage. The method is applicable for both quantitative and qualitative examinations but can fail occasionally in total count determination, especially if the sample material contains heterogeneous microbes. In model investigations with 53 strains of 17 different genera Enterobacteriaceae strains, Aeromonads and Enterococcus strains proved to be highly impedance effective. Lactobacillus strains and Pseudomonads as well as Staphylococcus aureus strains showed a low impedance effectiveness. Several strains, for example of the genera Micrococcus, Acinetobacter and Brochothrix, did not show any changes of the medium impedance under the chosen conditions. Criterion for characterization of impedance effectiveness was the impedance detection time starting with identical initial counts (10(3) cfu/ml). Impedance effectiveness of microbes was determined at highly varying degree by the parameters of generation time, lag-phase duration and relative activity. This can lead either to wrong negative (underestimations) or wrong positive (overestimations) results of bacterial count.</p>","PeriodicalId":23829,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B","volume":"45 9","pages":"551-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impedance technique mostly meets today's requirements of microbiological rapid methods. At relatively high prime cost for the equipment the advantages are marked by low personnel and material costs as well as swiftness combined with highly flexible usage. The method is applicable for both quantitative and qualitative examinations but can fail occasionally in total count determination, especially if the sample material contains heterogeneous microbes. In model investigations with 53 strains of 17 different genera Enterobacteriaceae strains, Aeromonads and Enterococcus strains proved to be highly impedance effective. Lactobacillus strains and Pseudomonads as well as Staphylococcus aureus strains showed a low impedance effectiveness. Several strains, for example of the genera Micrococcus, Acinetobacter and Brochothrix, did not show any changes of the medium impedance under the chosen conditions. Criterion for characterization of impedance effectiveness was the impedance detection time starting with identical initial counts (10(3) cfu/ml). Impedance effectiveness of microbes was determined at highly varying degree by the parameters of generation time, lag-phase duration and relative activity. This can lead either to wrong negative (underestimations) or wrong positive (overestimations) results of bacterial count.

[食品卫生相关细菌阻抗有效性的模型研究]。
阻抗技术在很大程度上满足了微生物快速检测的要求。该设备的主要成本相对较高,其优点是人员和材料成本低,使用灵活快捷。该方法适用于定量和定性检验,但在总数测定中偶尔会失败,特别是当样品材料含有异质微生物时。在肠杆菌科17属53株的模型研究中,气单胞菌和肠球菌具有高阻抗效应。乳酸菌、假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌表现出低阻抗效应。在选定的条件下,微球菌、不动杆菌和毛菌属等几种菌株的介质阻抗没有变化。阻抗有效性的表征标准是阻抗检测时间从相同的初始计数开始(10(3)cfu/ml)。微生物的阻抗有效性由产生时间、滞后期和相对活性等参数决定,但差异很大。这可能导致错误的阴性(低估)或错误的阳性(高估)细菌计数结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信