Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss.

D M Nondahl, K J Cruickshanks, T L Wiley, T S Tweed, R Klein, B E Klein
{"title":"Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss.","authors":"D M Nondahl,&nbsp;K J Cruickshanks,&nbsp;T L Wiley,&nbsp;T S Tweed,&nbsp;R Klein,&nbsp;B E Klein","doi":"10.3109/00206099809072983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy, in older adults, of questions assessing hearing loss. Study participants (n=3,556), aged 48-92 years, were examined in a population-based study of age-related hearing loss in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Self-report data from the ten-question Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-screening Version (HHIE-S), and four additional questions were compared with hearing loss as measured by pure-tone air conduction audiometry. The single question, 'Do you feel you have a hearing loss?' was the most sensitive question (sensitivity=71 per cent); its overall and gender-specific prevalence estimates were within 3.2 per cent of prevalence measures derived audiometrically, although age-group specific estimates were not as accurate. Using an HHIE-S total score >8 resulted in low sensitivity (34 per cent) and inaccurate prevalence estimates. These results indicate that, for some applications, one simple question may be sufficient for prevalence surveys of hearing loss among older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"37 5","pages":"295-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206099809072983","citationCount":"249","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099809072983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 249

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy, in older adults, of questions assessing hearing loss. Study participants (n=3,556), aged 48-92 years, were examined in a population-based study of age-related hearing loss in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Self-report data from the ten-question Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-screening Version (HHIE-S), and four additional questions were compared with hearing loss as measured by pure-tone air conduction audiometry. The single question, 'Do you feel you have a hearing loss?' was the most sensitive question (sensitivity=71 per cent); its overall and gender-specific prevalence estimates were within 3.2 per cent of prevalence measures derived audiometrically, although age-group specific estimates were not as accurate. Using an HHIE-S total score >8 resulted in low sensitivity (34 per cent) and inaccurate prevalence estimates. These results indicate that, for some applications, one simple question may be sufficient for prevalence surveys of hearing loss among older adults.

自我报告听力损失的准确性。
本研究的目的是评估老年人听力损失评估问题的准确性。研究参与者(n= 3556),年龄48-92岁,在威斯康辛州比弗坝的一项基于人群的年龄相关听力损失研究中进行了检查。从老年筛查版听力障碍量表(HHIE-S)的十题自述数据和四个附加问题与纯音空气传导测听法测量的听力损失进行比较。一个简单的问题,“你觉得你有听力损失吗?”是最敏感的问题(敏感性= 71%);其总体和按性别分列的流行率估计值与按听力学得出的流行率测量值相差在3.2%以内,尽管按年龄组分列的估计值不那么准确。使用HHIE-S总分>8会导致低敏感性(34%)和不准确的患病率估计。这些结果表明,在某些应用中,一个简单的问题可能足以对老年人听力损失的患病率进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信