[What are you doing when you are doing nothing? ERP components without a cognitive task].

S Lang, B Kotchoubey, A Lutz, N Birbaumer
{"title":"[What are you doing when you are doing nothing? ERP components without a cognitive task].","authors":"S Lang,&nbsp;B Kotchoubey,&nbsp;A Lutz,&nbsp;N Birbaumer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two experiments, an \"active\" and a \"passive\" oddball-paradigm (1. phase) with visual and auditive stimuli were performed. In both, two stimuli with a probability of 0.7/0.3 were presented. The oddball-sequence was replaced in the 2. phase without knowledge of the subjects by a sequence, in which only targets were presented. One group of the subjects has got an active task (counting the rare stimulus), the other group was told to view the stimuli passively. The rare stimulus in the oddball-sequence evoked a larger parietal P3, the auditive stimulation additionally a larger fronto-central N1 and the visual stimulation a larger central P2. The non-expected change into the 2. phase resulted in a reverse of the ERP-lateralization between 150-300 ms: Before the change of the probability the amplitudes were more negative left than right, thereafter more negative right than left. All components and effects in the active task maintained without task, but they decreased. The differences were larger with the visual stimuli. These results suggest, that the passive paradigm could be applied to patients with motoric deficits. From a theoretical point of view these results lead to certain difficulties in the interpretation of the functional importance of the P3. It can be explained better by the context-closure theory (Desmedt, 1980; Verleger, 1988) than by the context-updating theory (Donchin, 1981).</p>","PeriodicalId":79386,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","volume":"44 1","pages":"138-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two experiments, an "active" and a "passive" oddball-paradigm (1. phase) with visual and auditive stimuli were performed. In both, two stimuli with a probability of 0.7/0.3 were presented. The oddball-sequence was replaced in the 2. phase without knowledge of the subjects by a sequence, in which only targets were presented. One group of the subjects has got an active task (counting the rare stimulus), the other group was told to view the stimuli passively. The rare stimulus in the oddball-sequence evoked a larger parietal P3, the auditive stimulation additionally a larger fronto-central N1 and the visual stimulation a larger central P2. The non-expected change into the 2. phase resulted in a reverse of the ERP-lateralization between 150-300 ms: Before the change of the probability the amplitudes were more negative left than right, thereafter more negative right than left. All components and effects in the active task maintained without task, but they decreased. The differences were larger with the visual stimuli. These results suggest, that the passive paradigm could be applied to patients with motoric deficits. From a theoretical point of view these results lead to certain difficulties in the interpretation of the functional importance of the P3. It can be explained better by the context-closure theory (Desmedt, 1980; Verleger, 1988) than by the context-updating theory (Donchin, 1981).

当你什么都不做的时候,你在做什么?没有认知任务的ERP组件]。
两个实验,一个“主动”和一个“被动”古怪范式(1)。第二阶段:视觉和听觉刺激。在这两种情况下,出现了两个概率为0.7/0.3的刺激。奇数序列被替换为2。在不了解被试者的情况下,按顺序进行阶段试验,其中只呈现目标。一组受试者被要求执行一项主动任务(计算罕见的刺激),另一组被告知被动地观看刺激。奇球序列中的罕见刺激诱发了较大的顶叶P3,听觉刺激诱发了较大的额-中枢N1,视觉刺激诱发了较大的中枢P2。非预期的变化变成2。在150 ~ 300 ms期间,erp偏侧化发生逆转,在概率变化前,左负振幅大于右负振幅,其后右负振幅大于左负振幅。活动任务中的所有成分和作用在没有任务的情况下保持不变,但有所下降。视觉刺激的差异更大。这些结果表明,被动模式可以应用于运动障碍患者。从理论的角度来看,这些结果导致在解释P3的功能重要性方面存在一定的困难。语境封闭理论(Desmedt, 1980;Verleger, 1988),而不是语境更新理论(Donchin, 1981)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信