[llocalization of grouping effect in overlapping tasks].

W Sommer, H Leuthold, R Abdel-Rahman, E M Pfütze
{"title":"[llocalization of grouping effect in overlapping tasks].","authors":"W Sommer,&nbsp;H Leuthold,&nbsp;R Abdel-Rahman,&nbsp;E M Pfütze","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In certain kinds of overlapping tasks subjects have to respond to two stimuli (S1 and S2), presented in close succession with variable onset asynchrony (SOA), carrying out two different responses (R1 and R2). When responding to S1 is given priority over S2 processing, reaction time (RT) to the first stimulus is unaffected by SOA. However, sometimes subjects adopt, either spontaneously or because of instruction, a different processing strategy called grouping. In this case R1 is postponed until R2 has been determined too. The present study addresses the localization of the postponed processing stage by means of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). One group of subjects was instructed to group responses and a second group was to give priority to S1 processing. The adherence to instructions was verified by subjects' reaction times. In case of grouping the interval between LRP onset and overt reaction increased proportionally to the postponement caused by SOA. In contrast, the interval between stimulus and LRP onset was unaffected by SOA. These findings speak against assumptions that grouping causes response activation postponement; rather, the corresponding reaction is already selected and activated prior to postponement.</p>","PeriodicalId":79386,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","volume":"44 1","pages":"103-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In certain kinds of overlapping tasks subjects have to respond to two stimuli (S1 and S2), presented in close succession with variable onset asynchrony (SOA), carrying out two different responses (R1 and R2). When responding to S1 is given priority over S2 processing, reaction time (RT) to the first stimulus is unaffected by SOA. However, sometimes subjects adopt, either spontaneously or because of instruction, a different processing strategy called grouping. In this case R1 is postponed until R2 has been determined too. The present study addresses the localization of the postponed processing stage by means of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). One group of subjects was instructed to group responses and a second group was to give priority to S1 processing. The adherence to instructions was verified by subjects' reaction times. In case of grouping the interval between LRP onset and overt reaction increased proportionally to the postponement caused by SOA. In contrast, the interval between stimulus and LRP onset was unaffected by SOA. These findings speak against assumptions that grouping causes response activation postponement; rather, the corresponding reaction is already selected and activated prior to postponement.

[重叠任务中分组效应的局部化]。
在某些类型的重叠任务中,被试必须对两个刺激(S1和S2)作出反应,它们以可变启动异步(SOA)紧密连续呈现,并执行两种不同的反应(R1和R2)。当对S1的响应优先于S2处理时,对第一个刺激的反应时间(RT)不受SOA的影响。然而,有时受试者自发地或由于指示而采用一种不同的处理策略,称为分组。在这种情况下,R1被推迟到R2也被确定。本研究利用侧化准备电位(LRP)研究延迟加工阶段的定位。一组受试者被要求对反应进行分组,另一组受试者被要求优先处理S1。受试者的反应时间证实了他们对指示的遵守程度。在分组的情况下,LRP开始和公开反应之间的间隔与SOA引起的延迟成比例地增加。相比之下,刺激和LRP开始之间的间隔不受SOA的影响。这些发现反驳了分组导致反应激活延迟的假设;相反,相应的反应在推迟之前就已经被选择和激活了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信