[Stochastic relations between conscious and automatic memory processes: an expansion of the process-dissociation procedure].

T Krüger, B Vaterrodt-Plünnecke
{"title":"[Stochastic relations between conscious and automatic memory processes: an expansion of the process-dissociation procedure].","authors":"T Krüger,&nbsp;B Vaterrodt-Plünnecke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents an extension of the process dissociation procedure with wordstem completion, allowing the measurement of the stochastic relation between conscious and automatic processes. The conditional probabilities of conscious remembering with and without automatic processes can be determined. The determination of these conditional probabilities succeeds due to the extension of the process dissociation procedure by an indirect wordstem completion test, without referring to the usual assumptions of the dissociation paradigm. For the evaluation of this extended process dissociation procedure a multinomial model is presented which allows the distinction between voluntary and involuntary conscious memory. The model is applied to a study by ourselves and to an experiment published by Toth, Reingold, and Jacoby (1994). The results show that the assumptions of stochastic independence or redundancy as well as exclusivity of conscious and automatic processes are often violated. Two conscious processes with different probabilities of occurrence are found; voluntary and involuntary conscious memory processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":79386,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","volume":"44 2","pages":"220-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an extension of the process dissociation procedure with wordstem completion, allowing the measurement of the stochastic relation between conscious and automatic processes. The conditional probabilities of conscious remembering with and without automatic processes can be determined. The determination of these conditional probabilities succeeds due to the extension of the process dissociation procedure by an indirect wordstem completion test, without referring to the usual assumptions of the dissociation paradigm. For the evaluation of this extended process dissociation procedure a multinomial model is presented which allows the distinction between voluntary and involuntary conscious memory. The model is applied to a study by ourselves and to an experiment published by Toth, Reingold, and Jacoby (1994). The results show that the assumptions of stochastic independence or redundancy as well as exclusivity of conscious and automatic processes are often violated. Two conscious processes with different probabilities of occurrence are found; voluntary and involuntary conscious memory processes.

[有意识和自动记忆过程之间的随机关系:过程分离过程的扩展]。
本文提出了一种带有词干补全的过程解离过程的扩展,允许测量有意识和自动过程之间的随机关系。有和没有自动过程的有意识记忆的条件概率可以确定。这些条件概率的确定是成功的,因为通过间接词干补全测试扩展了过程解离过程,而没有参考解离范式的通常假设。为了评估这种扩展过程解离过程,提出了一个多项模型,该模型允许区分自愿和非自愿意识记忆。该模型应用于我们自己的一项研究以及Toth、Reingold和Jacoby(1994)发表的一项实验。结果表明,意识过程和自动过程的随机独立性或冗余性以及排他性的假设经常被违反。发现了两个不同发生概率的意识过程;有意识的和无意识的记忆过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信