{"title":"A comparison between arterial- and venous-sampled activated clotting time measurements.","authors":"E Zisman, B Rozenberg, Y Katz, A Ziser","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to compare activated clotting time (ACT) sampled from an arterial (heparin-flushed) line with the control, a venous (heparin-free) line, arterial and venous ACT values were assessed before and after cardiopulmonary bypass in 150 patients while undergoing open-heart surgery. ACT was measured by Hemochron 801 automatic analyzer. Baseline arterial ACT was significantly higher than baseline venous ACT (14%; p < 0.001, using one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons test). The differences between the values of arterial and venous ACT after protamine reversal, between arterial ACT at baseline and after protamine reversal, and between venous ACT at baseline and after protamine reversal were not statistically significant. We conclude that arterial-sampled ACT measurement is suitable and reliable for monitoring heparin reversal by protamine after cardiopulmonary bypass.</p>","PeriodicalId":14590,"journal":{"name":"Israel journal of medical sciences","volume":"33 12","pages":"786-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In order to compare activated clotting time (ACT) sampled from an arterial (heparin-flushed) line with the control, a venous (heparin-free) line, arterial and venous ACT values were assessed before and after cardiopulmonary bypass in 150 patients while undergoing open-heart surgery. ACT was measured by Hemochron 801 automatic analyzer. Baseline arterial ACT was significantly higher than baseline venous ACT (14%; p < 0.001, using one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons test). The differences between the values of arterial and venous ACT after protamine reversal, between arterial ACT at baseline and after protamine reversal, and between venous ACT at baseline and after protamine reversal were not statistically significant. We conclude that arterial-sampled ACT measurement is suitable and reliable for monitoring heparin reversal by protamine after cardiopulmonary bypass.