[A case-control study of ovarian cancer to identify its risk factors].

Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 1996-10-01
M Mori, H Nishimura, T Nishida, T Sugiyama, K Komai, H Ide, M Yakushiji, K Fukuda, T Tanaka, M Yokoyama, H Sugimori
{"title":"[A case-control study of ovarian cancer to identify its risk factors].","authors":"M Mori,&nbsp;H Nishimura,&nbsp;T Nishida,&nbsp;T Sugiyama,&nbsp;K Komai,&nbsp;H Ide,&nbsp;M Yakushiji,&nbsp;K Fukuda,&nbsp;T Tanaka,&nbsp;M Yokoyama,&nbsp;H Sugimori","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To analyze the association between the potential risk factors and ovarian cancer, we conducted a case-control study from October, 1994 to January, 1996 in northern Kyushu. We interviewed 78 patients whose ovarian cancer was histologically confirmed, and 346 controls, selected from women at mass screening, who had not ever suffered from a cancer or an ovarian disorder. An odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated by the conditional logistic regression method. As a result, it was found that the risk was significantly increased for a family history of ovarian cancer in a mother or a sister (OR = 2.85, 95% CI 1.01-8.08), for heavier maximum body weight in the past (trend, OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.63), and for larger maximum body mass index (trend, OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.60). Conversely, the risk was significantly decreased with the number of parities (trend, OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.83), and with experience in having ever taken oral contraceptive pills (OR could not be calculated, p < 0.05). The positive relationship of maximum body weight or maximum body mass index to the ovarian cancer risk may in part explain the recent increase in the incidence of ovarian cancer in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":19498,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai zasshi","volume":"48 10","pages":"875-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To analyze the association between the potential risk factors and ovarian cancer, we conducted a case-control study from October, 1994 to January, 1996 in northern Kyushu. We interviewed 78 patients whose ovarian cancer was histologically confirmed, and 346 controls, selected from women at mass screening, who had not ever suffered from a cancer or an ovarian disorder. An odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated by the conditional logistic regression method. As a result, it was found that the risk was significantly increased for a family history of ovarian cancer in a mother or a sister (OR = 2.85, 95% CI 1.01-8.08), for heavier maximum body weight in the past (trend, OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.63), and for larger maximum body mass index (trend, OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.60). Conversely, the risk was significantly decreased with the number of parities (trend, OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.83), and with experience in having ever taken oral contraceptive pills (OR could not be calculated, p < 0.05). The positive relationship of maximum body weight or maximum body mass index to the ovarian cancer risk may in part explain the recent increase in the incidence of ovarian cancer in Japan.

[卵巢癌的病例对照研究,以确定其危险因素]。
为了分析潜在危险因素与卵巢癌的关系,我们于1994年10月至1996年1月在九州北部进行了病例对照研究。我们采访了78名经组织学证实的卵巢癌患者,以及346名对照者,这些患者从大规模筛查的女性中挑选出来,从未患过癌症或卵巢疾病。比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(95% CI)采用条件logistic回归方法估计。结果发现,母亲或姐妹中有卵巢癌家族史(or = 2.85, 95% CI 1.01-8.08)、过去最大体重较大(趋势,or = 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.63)和最大体重指数较大(趋势,or = 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.60)的风险显著增加。相反,风险随胎次数(趋势,OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.83)和服用过口服避孕药的经验(OR无法计算,p < 0.05)而显著降低。最大体重或最大体重指数与卵巢癌风险的正相关关系可能部分解释了最近日本卵巢癌发病率的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信