Repeatability of intravital capillaroscopic measurement of capillary density.

M Lamah, H Chaudhry, P S Mortimer, J A Dormandy
{"title":"Repeatability of intravital capillaroscopic measurement of capillary density.","authors":"M Lamah,&nbsp;H Chaudhry,&nbsp;P S Mortimer,&nbsp;J A Dormandy","doi":"10.1159/000179147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reliability of intravital capillaroscopy for determining capillary density (CD) of skin has been questioned because it depends upon the variability of the measuring process and subjective interpretation of data as well as the intrinsic heterogeneity of capillary spacing. The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of a standardised method for measuring CD of the skin of the dorsum of foot. In each of 30 subjects (10 controls and 20 patients with peripheral vascular disease), the foot was systematically mapped by examining 20 sites on the dorsum of foot and 2 sites on each toe, using white light (native) videomicroscopy at 40 x magnification. Off-line analysis of videoprints was then undertaken to determine CD at each site, by counting capillaries within areas of acceptable photographic quality only, having first defined the criteria for counting capillaries. The mean values were then calculated and taken to represent the CD of the foot or toes. Repeatability of the measuring equipment was first assessed by noting the presence or absence of each corresponding capillary in 2 prints, taken at intervals of hours or days (in 10 subjects) or months (in 2 patients), of an identical area of skin which was marked by a microtattoo on the first occasion. On average, 95% of corresponding capillaries were identified in both prints (from controls and patients), thus implying little intrinsic temporal variation of capillary anatomy as well as excellent repeatability of the measuring equipment. Repeatability of data analysis was assessed by the same observer reading the same 20 prints in a blinded manner on three separate occasions (intraobserver repeatability), and 2 observers reading the same 24 prints (interobserver repeatability). The mean coefficient of intraobserver variation of CD estimate was 5.6% and the interobserver correlation coefficient was 0.94. Finally, overall repeatability of the method was assessed by repeating the procedure on a subsequent occasion (mean time interval of 5 days) in 10 subjects. The rate of agreement in mean CD between the two procedures [defined as 100- (difference between the two measurements/mean of the two measurements) x 100]% ranged from 86.4 to 97.1% (mean 93.5%). Thus using the above methodological technique, native capillaroscopy can be reliably used to determine CD of the dorsum of foot in comparing patient subgroups, as well as in longitudinal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14035,"journal":{"name":"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000179147","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000179147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The reliability of intravital capillaroscopy for determining capillary density (CD) of skin has been questioned because it depends upon the variability of the measuring process and subjective interpretation of data as well as the intrinsic heterogeneity of capillary spacing. The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of a standardised method for measuring CD of the skin of the dorsum of foot. In each of 30 subjects (10 controls and 20 patients with peripheral vascular disease), the foot was systematically mapped by examining 20 sites on the dorsum of foot and 2 sites on each toe, using white light (native) videomicroscopy at 40 x magnification. Off-line analysis of videoprints was then undertaken to determine CD at each site, by counting capillaries within areas of acceptable photographic quality only, having first defined the criteria for counting capillaries. The mean values were then calculated and taken to represent the CD of the foot or toes. Repeatability of the measuring equipment was first assessed by noting the presence or absence of each corresponding capillary in 2 prints, taken at intervals of hours or days (in 10 subjects) or months (in 2 patients), of an identical area of skin which was marked by a microtattoo on the first occasion. On average, 95% of corresponding capillaries were identified in both prints (from controls and patients), thus implying little intrinsic temporal variation of capillary anatomy as well as excellent repeatability of the measuring equipment. Repeatability of data analysis was assessed by the same observer reading the same 20 prints in a blinded manner on three separate occasions (intraobserver repeatability), and 2 observers reading the same 24 prints (interobserver repeatability). The mean coefficient of intraobserver variation of CD estimate was 5.6% and the interobserver correlation coefficient was 0.94. Finally, overall repeatability of the method was assessed by repeating the procedure on a subsequent occasion (mean time interval of 5 days) in 10 subjects. The rate of agreement in mean CD between the two procedures [defined as 100- (difference between the two measurements/mean of the two measurements) x 100]% ranged from 86.4 to 97.1% (mean 93.5%). Thus using the above methodological technique, native capillaroscopy can be reliably used to determine CD of the dorsum of foot in comparing patient subgroups, as well as in longitudinal studies.

活体毛细管镜测量毛细血管密度的可重复性。
活体毛细管镜检查测定皮肤毛细血管密度(CD)的可靠性一直受到质疑,因为它取决于测量过程的可变性、对数据的主观解释以及毛细血管间距的内在异质性。本研究的目的是评估测量足背皮肤CD的标准化方法的可重复性。在每30名受试者中(10名对照组和20名周围血管疾病患者),使用40倍放大的白光(天然)视频显微镜,通过检查足背上的20个位点和每个脚趾上的2个位点,系统地绘制足部图。然后对录影进行离线分析,以确定每个地点的CD,方法是只对摄影质量可接受的区域内的毛细血管进行计数,并首先确定毛细血管计数的标准。然后计算平均值,并将其用于表示足部或脚趾的CD。测量设备的可重复性首先通过记录2个指纹中每个相应毛细血管的存在或不存在来评估,每隔几小时或几天(10名受试者)或几个月(2名患者),在第一次用微纹身标记的同一皮肤区域进行两次打印。平均而言,95%的相应毛细血管在两种指纹中都被识别出来(来自对照组和患者),这意味着毛细血管解剖的内在时间变化很小,测量设备的重复性也很好。数据分析的可重复性由同一名观察者在三个不同的场合以盲法阅读相同的20张印刷品(观察者内可重复性)和2名观察者阅读相同的24张印刷品(观察者间可重复性)来评估。CD估计的观察者内变异系数均值为5.6%,观察者间相关系数均值为0.94。最后,通过在随后的10个受试者中重复该过程(平均间隔5天)来评估该方法的总体可重复性。两种方法的平均CD符合率[定义为100-(两次测量之间的差异/两次测量的平均值)× 100]%的范围为86.4至97.1%(平均93.5%)。因此,使用上述方法学技术,在比较患者亚组以及纵向研究中,可以可靠地使用原生毛细血管镜检查来确定足背CD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信