An evaluation of mammography beliefs using a decision model.

M K Salazar, C de Moor
{"title":"An evaluation of mammography beliefs using a decision model.","authors":"M K Salazar,&nbsp;C de Moor","doi":"10.1177/109019819502200110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to identify factors that contribute to a group of working women's decision related to mammography. The study was guided by a decision model called the Multiattribute Utility Model. Exploratory interviews were conducted among 36 women to identify positive and negative factors associated with the mammography decision. Eighteen factors emerged and were categorized into three broad areas: Knowledge and Attitudes (Confidence in Efficacy, Personal Risk, Other Means of Knowing, Fear of Cancer/Treatment, Belief in Fate, Embarrassment), Issues Related to Participation (Accessibility and Convenience, Difficulty Arranging, Time, Cost, Pain, Radiation), and Social Concerns (Role Model, Responsibility to Self, Responsibility to Others, Family/Friends' Influence, Societal Influences, Health Care Providers' Influence). This information served as the basis of a survey among 87 women to determine the importance of these factors. Seven factors emerged as significantly different between compliers and noncompliers. In order of significance, they were Difficulty Arranging, Fear of Cancer/Treatment, Cost, Accessibility and Convenience, Time, Other Means of Knowing, and Influence of Health Care Provider. The predictive validity of this analysis was 85%. Implications of findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77155,"journal":{"name":"Health education quarterly","volume":"22 1","pages":"110-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/109019819502200110","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819502200110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that contribute to a group of working women's decision related to mammography. The study was guided by a decision model called the Multiattribute Utility Model. Exploratory interviews were conducted among 36 women to identify positive and negative factors associated with the mammography decision. Eighteen factors emerged and were categorized into three broad areas: Knowledge and Attitudes (Confidence in Efficacy, Personal Risk, Other Means of Knowing, Fear of Cancer/Treatment, Belief in Fate, Embarrassment), Issues Related to Participation (Accessibility and Convenience, Difficulty Arranging, Time, Cost, Pain, Radiation), and Social Concerns (Role Model, Responsibility to Self, Responsibility to Others, Family/Friends' Influence, Societal Influences, Health Care Providers' Influence). This information served as the basis of a survey among 87 women to determine the importance of these factors. Seven factors emerged as significantly different between compliers and noncompliers. In order of significance, they were Difficulty Arranging, Fear of Cancer/Treatment, Cost, Accessibility and Convenience, Time, Other Means of Knowing, and Influence of Health Care Provider. The predictive validity of this analysis was 85%. Implications of findings are discussed.

使用决策模型评估乳房x光检查信念。
本研究的目的是确定影响一组职业女性决定是否接受乳房x光检查的因素。该研究以一种称为多属性效用模型的决策模型为指导。对36名妇女进行了探索性访谈,以确定与乳房x光检查决定相关的积极和消极因素。出现了18个因素,并将其分为三大领域:知识和态度(对疗效的信心、个人风险、其他了解方式、对癌症/治疗的恐惧、对命运的信念、尴尬)、与参与有关的问题(可及性和便利性、安排困难、时间、成本、痛苦、辐射)和社会关注(角色模范、对自己的责任、对他人的责任、家人/朋友的影响、社会影响、卫生保健提供者的影响)。这些信息成为对87名妇女进行调查的基础,以确定这些因素的重要性。报告者和非报告者在7个因素上存在显著差异。影响因素依次为:安排困难程度、对癌症/治疗的恐惧程度、费用、可及性和便利性、时间、其他了解方式和医疗服务提供者的影响。该分析的预测效度为85%。讨论了研究结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信