[Premature rupture of membranes at term. Retrospective study of 88 cases].

M Dreyfus, J J Baldauf, F Boesinger, I Tissier, J Andrianivo, M Lehmann, J Ritter
{"title":"[Premature rupture of membranes at term. Retrospective study of 88 cases].","authors":"M Dreyfus,&nbsp;J J Baldauf,&nbsp;F Boesinger,&nbsp;I Tissier,&nbsp;J Andrianivo,&nbsp;M Lehmann,&nbsp;J Ritter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A retrospective study enabled us to evaluate the \"wait-and-see\" attitude adopted in our department in case of premature rupture of the membranes at term. The series included 88 patients (9.74%) who delivered spontaneously or after induction. The following maternal parameters were studied:time between rupture and delivery, pyrexia and chorioamnionitis number of vaginal digital examinations, histology and placental bacteriology. Neonatal criteria were based upon an infection assessment. Our results showed that approximately 80% of patients were in labor within 24 hours following rupture. Cesarean section rate remained stable (13%) in comparison with the overall rate for the department. Neonatal infectious morbidity (5.7%) showed no increase. The incidence of chorioamniotitis did not vary (7 cases) but appeared to be related to the number of vaginal examinations before labor. In conclusion, our attitude of temporization did not result in any increase in the number of cesarean sections nor of neonatal infections in comparison with the general population in the department. Prostaglandins might be useful in unfavorable obstetric situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21300,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A retrospective study enabled us to evaluate the "wait-and-see" attitude adopted in our department in case of premature rupture of the membranes at term. The series included 88 patients (9.74%) who delivered spontaneously or after induction. The following maternal parameters were studied:time between rupture and delivery, pyrexia and chorioamnionitis number of vaginal digital examinations, histology and placental bacteriology. Neonatal criteria were based upon an infection assessment. Our results showed that approximately 80% of patients were in labor within 24 hours following rupture. Cesarean section rate remained stable (13%) in comparison with the overall rate for the department. Neonatal infectious morbidity (5.7%) showed no increase. The incidence of chorioamniotitis did not vary (7 cases) but appeared to be related to the number of vaginal examinations before labor. In conclusion, our attitude of temporization did not result in any increase in the number of cesarean sections nor of neonatal infections in comparison with the general population in the department. Prostaglandins might be useful in unfavorable obstetric situations.

[足月时胎膜过早破裂]88例回顾性分析[j]。
一项回顾性研究使我们能够评估我们科对足月胎膜早破所采取的“观望”态度。该系列包括88例(9.74%)自然分娩或引产后分娩的患者。研究产妇的以下参数:破裂至分娩时间、发热、绒毛膜羊膜炎、阴道指诊次数、组织学和胎盘细菌学。新生儿标准以感染评估为基础。我们的结果显示,大约80%的患者在破裂后24小时内分娩。剖宫产率与该科整体剖宫产率相比保持稳定(13%)。新生儿感染发病率(5.7%)未见增加。绒毛膜羊膜炎的发生率没有变化(7例),但似乎与分娩前阴道检查的次数有关。总之,我们的拖延态度并没有导致剖宫产的数量增加,也没有导致新生儿感染与科内一般人群相比。前列腺素可能在不利的产科情况下有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信