[Psychiatric diagnosis and nosological theory: studies on the individual diagnostic schema of the physician].

K D Sulz, G Gigerenzer
{"title":"[Psychiatric diagnosis and nosological theory: studies on the individual diagnostic schema of the physician].","authors":"K D Sulz,&nbsp;G Gigerenzer","doi":"10.1007/BF00343364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study is concerned with the diagnostic process of psychiatrists. Two concepts are investigated; the internalized nosological theory and the psychiatric diagnostic scheme. If patients or diseases are judged on predefined lists of symptoms (e.g. AMDP-list), we assume that judgments are based on the first one. If the psychiatrist, however, is free in the choice of relevant attributes in judging patients or diseases, we assume that his judgments are based on his individual diagnostic scheme. Results show high agreement in internalized nosological theories, but strong individual differences in diagnostic schemes. Interindividual agreement in internalized nosological theories is still greater than intraindividual agreement between diagnostic scheme and nosological theory. This proves that distinguishing the two concepts is meaningful. Structural components of both concepts, e.g., their dimensions, pregnant structures, and their metric, were analyzed by multidimensional scaling. We assume that the psychiatric diagnostic scheme determines the clinical diagnosis in everyday practice, whereas the internalized nosological theory is of importance mainly in research. The differences between both concepts suggest that lists of symptoms are not very helpful in analyzing clinical diagnosis. Thus, in order to achieve greater agreement in diagnosis, further and detailed analysis of individual \"implicit\" theories which determine the greater part of diagnostic schemes is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":55482,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","volume":"232 1","pages":"39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00343364","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study is concerned with the diagnostic process of psychiatrists. Two concepts are investigated; the internalized nosological theory and the psychiatric diagnostic scheme. If patients or diseases are judged on predefined lists of symptoms (e.g. AMDP-list), we assume that judgments are based on the first one. If the psychiatrist, however, is free in the choice of relevant attributes in judging patients or diseases, we assume that his judgments are based on his individual diagnostic scheme. Results show high agreement in internalized nosological theories, but strong individual differences in diagnostic schemes. Interindividual agreement in internalized nosological theories is still greater than intraindividual agreement between diagnostic scheme and nosological theory. This proves that distinguishing the two concepts is meaningful. Structural components of both concepts, e.g., their dimensions, pregnant structures, and their metric, were analyzed by multidimensional scaling. We assume that the psychiatric diagnostic scheme determines the clinical diagnosis in everyday practice, whereas the internalized nosological theory is of importance mainly in research. The differences between both concepts suggest that lists of symptoms are not very helpful in analyzing clinical diagnosis. Thus, in order to achieve greater agreement in diagnosis, further and detailed analysis of individual "implicit" theories which determine the greater part of diagnostic schemes is necessary.

[精神病学诊断与病分学理论:医生个体诊断图式的研究]。
本研究关注精神科医生的诊断过程。研究了两个概念;内化病分学理论与精神病学诊断方案。如果根据预定义的症状列表(例如AMDP-list)对患者或疾病进行判断,我们假设判断是基于第一个。然而,如果精神科医生在判断病人或疾病时可以自由选择相关属性,我们假定他的判断是基于他的个人诊断方案。结果显示,在内化病分学理论高度一致,但在诊断方案强烈的个体差异。内化病理性理论的个体间一致性仍大于诊断方案与病理性理论的个体间一致性。这证明区分这两个概念是有意义的。这两个概念的结构成分,例如,他们的尺寸,怀孕结构,和他们的度量,分析了多维尺度。在日常实践中,我们假设精神病学诊断方案决定临床诊断,而内化病理性理论主要在研究中发挥重要作用。这两个概念之间的差异表明,症状列表在分析临床诊断时并不是很有帮助。因此,为了在诊断上取得更大的一致性,有必要对决定大部分诊断方案的个别“隐性”理论进行进一步和详细的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信