Base rate data for the WAIS-R: test-retest stability and VIQ-PIQ differences.

J D Matarazzo, D O Herman
{"title":"Base rate data for the WAIS-R: test-retest stability and VIQ-PIQ differences.","authors":"J D Matarazzo,&nbsp;D O Herman","doi":"10.1080/01688638408401227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The data analyzed were the 14 WAIS-R scores from each of the individuals who comprised the WAIS-R standardization sample. Examined was the individual VIQ-PIQ difference from only the initial examination of each of the 1880 subjects, as well as the test-retest change in each of the 14 WAIS-R scores for each of the 119 subjects who were retested. The results revealed that, although the WAIS-R has excellent psychometric reliability as reflected in its standard error of measurement of a VIQ-PIQ difference and its impressively high test-retest Pearson r values, the actual magnitudes of the differences between the VIQ and PIQ assessed in a single examination, or the magnitudes of gain or loss in the 14 scores on retest, for some of these normal individuals were sufficiently high that such base-rate data should be routinely considered by clinical neuropsychologists and other practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":79225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","volume":"6 4","pages":"351-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01688638408401227","citationCount":"186","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638408401227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 186

Abstract

The data analyzed were the 14 WAIS-R scores from each of the individuals who comprised the WAIS-R standardization sample. Examined was the individual VIQ-PIQ difference from only the initial examination of each of the 1880 subjects, as well as the test-retest change in each of the 14 WAIS-R scores for each of the 119 subjects who were retested. The results revealed that, although the WAIS-R has excellent psychometric reliability as reflected in its standard error of measurement of a VIQ-PIQ difference and its impressively high test-retest Pearson r values, the actual magnitudes of the differences between the VIQ and PIQ assessed in a single examination, or the magnitudes of gain or loss in the 14 scores on retest, for some of these normal individuals were sufficiently high that such base-rate data should be routinely considered by clinical neuropsychologists and other practitioners.

WAIS-R的基本率数据:重测稳定性和VIQ-PIQ差异。
分析的数据是来自每个组成WAIS-R标准化样本的个体的14个WAIS-R分数。研究了1880名受试者中每个人初次测试时的VIQ-PIQ差异,以及119名重新测试的受试者中每个人的14个WAIS-R分数的重新测试变化。结果表明,尽管WAIS-R具有出色的心理测量可靠性,这反映在其测量VIQ-PIQ差异的标准误差和令人印象深刻的高重测Pearson r值上,但单次测试中评估的VIQ和PIQ之间的实际差异大小,或重测14个分数的得失大小,对于这些正常个体中的一些人来说,这种基础率数据足够高,应该被临床神经心理学家和其他从业者常规考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信