Evaluation of the arterial blood pressure of dogs by two noninvasive methods.

A Chalifoux, A Dallaire, D Blais, N Larivière, N Pelletier
{"title":"Evaluation of the arterial blood pressure of dogs by two noninvasive methods.","authors":"A Chalifoux,&nbsp;A Dallaire,&nbsp;D Blais,&nbsp;N Larivière,&nbsp;N Pelletier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The determination of the arterial blood pressure was done on 12 healthy mixed breed dogs in both the anesthetized and the conscious state, to evaluate two instruments (Doppler flow detector and infrasonde D4000), in their ability to indirectly determine arterial blood pressure. The coefficients of variation were higher with indirect methods when compared with the results obtained by cannulation. These coefficients were lower with the Doppler flow detector. The correlation study showed that both apparatuses were reliable in most situations. The infrasonde D4000 was more accurate than the Doppler in the conscious animals. However the results showed a lack of precision in hypertensive conscious dogs. The diastolic arterial blood pressure was particularly precise in the case of the anesthetized hypotensive dogs. Its sensitivity allowed it to register muscle movement artifacts. The Doppler flow detector showed less variation and was particularly accurate in both anesthetized and conscious hypertensive dogs. Its sensitivity allowed artifact movement sounds to be detected. The Doppler should be used in quiet surroundings or earphones should be worn by the evaluator. Some form of restraint is needed with the use of both instruments. Even if the correlations with the direct arterial blood pressure values were better with the infrasonde D4000, greater variations were found in the individual readings. The Doppler instrument represents in the hands of the investigators a better instrument for routine monitoring of blood pressure in the dog.</p>","PeriodicalId":9546,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee","volume":"49 4","pages":"419-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1236204/pdf/compmed00004-0071.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The determination of the arterial blood pressure was done on 12 healthy mixed breed dogs in both the anesthetized and the conscious state, to evaluate two instruments (Doppler flow detector and infrasonde D4000), in their ability to indirectly determine arterial blood pressure. The coefficients of variation were higher with indirect methods when compared with the results obtained by cannulation. These coefficients were lower with the Doppler flow detector. The correlation study showed that both apparatuses were reliable in most situations. The infrasonde D4000 was more accurate than the Doppler in the conscious animals. However the results showed a lack of precision in hypertensive conscious dogs. The diastolic arterial blood pressure was particularly precise in the case of the anesthetized hypotensive dogs. Its sensitivity allowed it to register muscle movement artifacts. The Doppler flow detector showed less variation and was particularly accurate in both anesthetized and conscious hypertensive dogs. Its sensitivity allowed artifact movement sounds to be detected. The Doppler should be used in quiet surroundings or earphones should be worn by the evaluator. Some form of restraint is needed with the use of both instruments. Even if the correlations with the direct arterial blood pressure values were better with the infrasonde D4000, greater variations were found in the individual readings. The Doppler instrument represents in the hands of the investigators a better instrument for routine monitoring of blood pressure in the dog.

两种无创方法评价犬动脉血压。
对12只健康杂交犬在麻醉状态和清醒状态下进行了动脉血压测定,以评价两种仪器(多普勒血流检测器和次声仪D4000)间接测定动脉血压的能力。与插管法比较,间接法的变异系数更高。这些系数较低,与多普勒流量检测器。相关性研究表明,这两种仪器在大多数情况下都是可靠的。在有意识的动物中,D4000次声波比多普勒更准确。然而,结果显示,在高血压意识的狗缺乏准确性。在麻醉的低血压犬的情况下,舒张动脉血压特别精确。它的灵敏度使它能够记录肌肉运动的产物。多普勒血流检测器显示变化较小,在麻醉和有意识的高血压狗中都特别准确。它的灵敏度可以探测到藏物移动的声音。多普勒应在安静的环境中使用,或由评估者佩戴耳机。在使用这两种工具时,需要某种形式的约束。即使次声仪D4000与直接动脉血压值的相关性更好,但在个人读数中发现了更大的差异。多普勒仪器在研究者手中代表了一种更好的狗的血压常规监测仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信