A critical examination of empirical studies of the diagnosis of borderline disorders in adults.

Psychiatric developments Pub Date : 1985-01-01
A A Dahl
{"title":"A critical examination of empirical studies of the diagnosis of borderline disorders in adults.","authors":"A A Dahl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnosis of borderline disorders poses complex problems of a semantic and methodological nature. The various diagnostic criteria sets published are examined and compared. Gunderson's borderline personality disorder and the DSM-III schizotypal and borderline disorders are recommended, as used with the structured interviews developed for them. Problems concerning the relationship of borderline disorders to the major psychoses, the importance of brief psychotic experiences, diagnostic efficiency of items, and various cut-off levels of criteria are discussed in detail, and proposals for further research are pointed out.</p>","PeriodicalId":77773,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric developments","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnosis of borderline disorders poses complex problems of a semantic and methodological nature. The various diagnostic criteria sets published are examined and compared. Gunderson's borderline personality disorder and the DSM-III schizotypal and borderline disorders are recommended, as used with the structured interviews developed for them. Problems concerning the relationship of borderline disorders to the major psychoses, the importance of brief psychotic experiences, diagnostic efficiency of items, and various cut-off levels of criteria are discussed in detail, and proposals for further research are pointed out.

对成人边缘性障碍诊断的实证研究进行了批判性检查。
边缘障碍的诊断提出了语义学和方法学性质的复杂问题。对出版的各种诊断标准集进行了检查和比较。Gunderson的边缘型人格障碍和DSM-III的分裂型和边缘型障碍被推荐使用,并与为他们开发的结构化访谈一起使用。就边缘性精神障碍与主要精神疾病的关系、短暂精神体验的重要性、项目的诊断效率、标准的不同截止水平等问题进行了详细讨论,并提出了进一步研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信