Third-line treatment of biliary tract cancers in a real-life setting

IF 1.7
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100345
A. Boilève, A. Mihaele, M. Khoury, A. Hollebecque, C. Smolenschi, L. Antoun, N. Masri, M. Valéry, T. Pudlarz, A. Fuerea, F. Facchinetti, A. Tarabay, D. Malka, V. Boige, M.-L. Tanguy, M. Ducreux
{"title":"Third-line treatment of biliary tract cancers in a real-life setting","authors":"A. Boilève,&nbsp;A. Mihaele,&nbsp;M. Khoury,&nbsp;A. Hollebecque,&nbsp;C. Smolenschi,&nbsp;L. Antoun,&nbsp;N. Masri,&nbsp;M. Valéry,&nbsp;T. Pudlarz,&nbsp;A. Fuerea,&nbsp;F. Facchinetti,&nbsp;A. Tarabay,&nbsp;D. Malka,&nbsp;V. Boige,&nbsp;M.-L. Tanguy,&nbsp;M. Ducreux","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Biliary tract cancers represent rare, aggressive malignancies of the bile duct epithelium. Only 20% cases are eligible for curative surgery because most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, and prognosis is overall poor. The systemic treatment landscape has evolved, with gemcitabine cisplatin plus immunotherapy being now first-line standard. For second-line treatment, options include targeted therapies or chemotherapy for patients with or without specific actionable genetic alterations, respectively. However, no third-line treatment standard has been validated by randomized clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis from a specialized French center aimed to assess patient outcomes receiving third-line chemotherapy, from 2012 to 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 256 patients receiving third-line treatment were included. Treatment distribution was as follows: FOLFIRI (<em>n</em> = 51, 20%), paclitaxel (<em>n</em> = 43, 17%), combinations of 5-FU cisplatin/FOLFOX (<em>n</em> = 32, 13%), molecularly targeted therapy (<em>n</em> = 65, 25%) and others (<em>n</em> = 63, 25%). In patients without actionable alterations, the median overall survival (OS) for patients receiving third-line treatment was 10.2 months. OS was 13 months with paclitaxel and 7 months with FOLFIRI (<em>P</em> = 0.03). The median progression-free survival for the third-line treatments was 3.3 months for paclitaxel and 2.6 months with FOLFIRI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Paclitaxel seemed better than FOLFIRI as third-line treatment in patients without actionable alteration. This highlights the need for further research, especially in identifying prognostic factors and refining treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819826000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Biliary tract cancers represent rare, aggressive malignancies of the bile duct epithelium. Only 20% cases are eligible for curative surgery because most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, and prognosis is overall poor. The systemic treatment landscape has evolved, with gemcitabine cisplatin plus immunotherapy being now first-line standard. For second-line treatment, options include targeted therapies or chemotherapy for patients with or without specific actionable genetic alterations, respectively. However, no third-line treatment standard has been validated by randomized clinical trials.

Patients and methods

This retrospective analysis from a specialized French center aimed to assess patient outcomes receiving third-line chemotherapy, from 2012 to 2023.

Results

Overall, 256 patients receiving third-line treatment were included. Treatment distribution was as follows: FOLFIRI (n = 51, 20%), paclitaxel (n = 43, 17%), combinations of 5-FU cisplatin/FOLFOX (n = 32, 13%), molecularly targeted therapy (n = 65, 25%) and others (n = 63, 25%). In patients without actionable alterations, the median overall survival (OS) for patients receiving third-line treatment was 10.2 months. OS was 13 months with paclitaxel and 7 months with FOLFIRI (P = 0.03). The median progression-free survival for the third-line treatments was 3.3 months for paclitaxel and 2.6 months with FOLFIRI.

Conclusion

Paclitaxel seemed better than FOLFIRI as third-line treatment in patients without actionable alteration. This highlights the need for further research, especially in identifying prognostic factors and refining treatment strategies.
现实生活中胆道癌症的三线治疗
胆道癌是胆管上皮罕见的侵袭性恶性肿瘤。只有20%的病例有资格进行治疗性手术,因为大多数病例是在晚期诊断出来的,总体预后较差。全身治疗方案已经发生了变化,吉西他滨顺铂加免疫治疗现在是一线标准。对于二线治疗,选择包括针对有或没有特定可操作的基因改变的患者的靶向治疗或化疗。然而,没有三线治疗标准被随机临床试验验证。患者和方法来自法国一家专业中心的回顾性分析,旨在评估2012年至2023年接受三线化疗的患者结果。结果共纳入256例接受三线治疗的患者。治疗分布如下:FOLFIRI (n = 51, 20%)、紫杉醇(n = 43, 17%)、5-FU顺铂/FOLFOX联合(n = 32, 13%)、分子靶向治疗(n = 65, 25%)和其他(n = 63, 25%)。在没有可操作改变的患者中,接受三线治疗的患者的中位总生存期(OS)为10.2个月。紫杉醇组的OS为13个月,FOLFIRI组的OS为7个月(P = 0.03)。三线治疗的中位无进展生存期紫杉醇为3.3个月,FOLFIRI为2.6个月。结论紫杉醇作为三线治疗在无可操作改变的患者中优于FOLFIRI。这突出了进一步研究的必要性,特别是在确定预后因素和改进治疗策略方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书