Assessing the coordination and consistency of the policy system for achieving China’s carbon neutrality goal based on text and network methods

IF 5.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Advances in Climate Change Research Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.accre.2025.12.002
Jin-Hua Xu , Xue-Ying Wang , Jie Su , Yuan-Yuan Wang
{"title":"Assessing the coordination and consistency of the policy system for achieving China’s carbon neutrality goal based on text and network methods","authors":"Jin-Hua Xu ,&nbsp;Xue-Ying Wang ,&nbsp;Jie Su ,&nbsp;Yuan-Yuan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.accre.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lack of coordination and consistency in government policy-making has long been recognized as a weakness, yet its systematic quantification has been neglected. This study investigates this shortcoming by employing computational linguistics and network analysis tools to evaluate the coordination and consistency of climate policies in China through cross-referencing and collaboration among the State Council, ministries and local governments. A comprehensive dictionary of key policy terms and objectives from two key climate policies issued by the State Council, namely Opinions and Action Plan, was constructed to evaluate the succeeding 95 policy documents. The analysis of linguistic discontinuity provides insights into the substantial lack of coordination among ministries, with only 17.5% of term pairings exhibiting co-reference. Nevertheless, the overall policy content remains largely consistent with the central government’s dual carbon goals. Key policy documents and influential ministries play a critical bridging role, fostering cross-sectoral coordination and serving as the core of the network. Local government policy analysis reveals substantial fragmentation, with only 21.6% of term pairings exhibiting co-reference. A large number of potential collaboration opportunities are identified, such as those between financial regulators and industry-related ministries in the area of green finance. It underscores the need for enhanced cross-department and inter-governmental cooperation and alignment to implement climate goals effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48628,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Climate Change Research","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 431-443"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Climate Change Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927825002631","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lack of coordination and consistency in government policy-making has long been recognized as a weakness, yet its systematic quantification has been neglected. This study investigates this shortcoming by employing computational linguistics and network analysis tools to evaluate the coordination and consistency of climate policies in China through cross-referencing and collaboration among the State Council, ministries and local governments. A comprehensive dictionary of key policy terms and objectives from two key climate policies issued by the State Council, namely Opinions and Action Plan, was constructed to evaluate the succeeding 95 policy documents. The analysis of linguistic discontinuity provides insights into the substantial lack of coordination among ministries, with only 17.5% of term pairings exhibiting co-reference. Nevertheless, the overall policy content remains largely consistent with the central government’s dual carbon goals. Key policy documents and influential ministries play a critical bridging role, fostering cross-sectoral coordination and serving as the core of the network. Local government policy analysis reveals substantial fragmentation, with only 21.6% of term pairings exhibiting co-reference. A large number of potential collaboration opportunities are identified, such as those between financial regulators and industry-related ministries in the area of green finance. It underscores the need for enhanced cross-department and inter-governmental cooperation and alignment to implement climate goals effectively.
基于文本与网络方法的中国碳中和目标政策体系协调性与一致性评估
长期以来,政府决策缺乏协调性和一致性一直被认为是一个弱点,但它的系统量化一直被忽视。本研究利用计算语言学和网络分析工具,通过国务院、各部委和地方政府之间的相互参照和合作,对中国气候政策的协调性和一致性进行了评估。根据国务院发布的《意见》和《行动计划》两项主要气候政策的主要政策术语和目标,构建了一个综合词典,对随后的95份政策文件进行评估。对语言不连续性的分析揭示了部门之间缺乏协调,只有17.5%的术语对表现出共同引用。然而,总体政策内容与中央政府的双碳目标基本一致。关键的政策文件和有影响力的部委发挥关键的桥梁作用,促进跨部门协调,并成为网络的核心。地方政府的政策分析显示出严重的碎片化,只有21.6%的术语对显示出共同参考。发现了大量潜在的合作机会,例如金融监管机构与行业相关部委之间在绿色金融领域的合作机会。它强调需要加强跨部门和政府间的合作和协调,以有效实施气候目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Climate Change Research
Advances in Climate Change Research Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
424
审稿时长
107 days
期刊介绍: Advances in Climate Change Research publishes scientific research and analyses on climate change and the interactions of climate change with society. This journal encompasses basic science and economic, social, and policy research, including studies on mitigation and adaptation to climate change. Advances in Climate Change Research attempts to promote research in climate change and provide an impetus for the application of research achievements in numerous aspects, such as socioeconomic sustainable development, responses to the adaptation and mitigation of climate change, diplomatic negotiations of climate and environment policies, and the protection and exploitation of natural resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书