[Usability of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Fractures].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Jakub Krutský, Šimon Kubov, Martin Čepelík, Petr Havránek, Tomáš Pešl
{"title":"[Usability of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Fractures].","authors":"Jakub Krutský, Šimon Kubov, Martin Čepelík, Petr Havránek, Tomáš Pešl","doi":"10.55095/achot2026/002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aims to evaluate the usability of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pediatric fractures. Ultrasound examination of patients with fractures diagnosed using radiography at the Clinic of Pediatric and Trauma Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and UTH between 27 May 2024 and 31 December 2024. We identified a total of 11 areas to be examined - clavicle, proximal humerus, elbow, forearm, metacarpal bones, fingers of the upper limb, sternum, femur, tibia, ankle, and metatarsal bones. The examination was performed independently by a surgeon and a radiologist, who selected the patients randomly during their treatment at the clinic. The entire bone was examined by ultrasound in all available projections, and signs of skeletal trauma (cortical bumping, cortical disruption, offset of bone fragments, chimney effect, or indirect signs such as joint effusion) were sought. A total of 61 patients were examined, of whom 24 girls (39%) and 37 boys (61%). The mean age of patients was 10 years (1-17 years). The overall agreement between ultrasound and radiologic examinations is 94%. Ultrasonography failed to visualize two fractures, namely a nondisplaced SH type II fracture of the distal fibula epiphysis and a nondisplaced SH type III fracture of the distal phalanx epiphysis. Two suspected fractures of the distal forearm detected by radiography were not observed by ultrasonography. The fracture was ruled out by a follow-up radiography, and the sonographic finding was found to be correct. Ultrasonography is a usable diagnostic method for skeletal trauma. The estimated sensitivity of this examination is around 97%. Our results indicate greater specificity of ultrasound in the forearm region. In agreement with literature, ultrasound can be considered usable for the diagnosis of fractures in all examined areas. In certain locations, it can also be used to measure displacement. The weak point of the study is the limited number of patients, therefore further investigation into these matters is necessary. Ultrasonography appears to be a useful screening method for skeletal trauma in children, serving as a basis for indication for radiography. This could help reduce the number of radiologic examinations performed by up to two-thirds, thereby reducing the radiation exposure in pediatric patients. Further research on these matters is needed, and diagnostic reliability indicators shall be defined. In the phase two of the study, we plan to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for all anatomical regions. The secondary objective is to evaluate the results achieved by the surgeon and the radiologist, the painfulness of the examination, and the usability of portable ultrasound devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"93 1","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2026/002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to evaluate the usability of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pediatric fractures. Ultrasound examination of patients with fractures diagnosed using radiography at the Clinic of Pediatric and Trauma Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and UTH between 27 May 2024 and 31 December 2024. We identified a total of 11 areas to be examined - clavicle, proximal humerus, elbow, forearm, metacarpal bones, fingers of the upper limb, sternum, femur, tibia, ankle, and metatarsal bones. The examination was performed independently by a surgeon and a radiologist, who selected the patients randomly during their treatment at the clinic. The entire bone was examined by ultrasound in all available projections, and signs of skeletal trauma (cortical bumping, cortical disruption, offset of bone fragments, chimney effect, or indirect signs such as joint effusion) were sought. A total of 61 patients were examined, of whom 24 girls (39%) and 37 boys (61%). The mean age of patients was 10 years (1-17 years). The overall agreement between ultrasound and radiologic examinations is 94%. Ultrasonography failed to visualize two fractures, namely a nondisplaced SH type II fracture of the distal fibula epiphysis and a nondisplaced SH type III fracture of the distal phalanx epiphysis. Two suspected fractures of the distal forearm detected by radiography were not observed by ultrasonography. The fracture was ruled out by a follow-up radiography, and the sonographic finding was found to be correct. Ultrasonography is a usable diagnostic method for skeletal trauma. The estimated sensitivity of this examination is around 97%. Our results indicate greater specificity of ultrasound in the forearm region. In agreement with literature, ultrasound can be considered usable for the diagnosis of fractures in all examined areas. In certain locations, it can also be used to measure displacement. The weak point of the study is the limited number of patients, therefore further investigation into these matters is necessary. Ultrasonography appears to be a useful screening method for skeletal trauma in children, serving as a basis for indication for radiography. This could help reduce the number of radiologic examinations performed by up to two-thirds, thereby reducing the radiation exposure in pediatric patients. Further research on these matters is needed, and diagnostic reliability indicators shall be defined. In the phase two of the study, we plan to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for all anatomical regions. The secondary objective is to evaluate the results achieved by the surgeon and the radiologist, the painfulness of the examination, and the usability of portable ultrasound devices.

[超声在小儿骨折诊断中的应用]。
本研究旨在评估超声在儿童骨折诊断中的可用性。2024年5月27日至2024年12月31日期间,在查尔斯大学第三医学院儿科和创伤外科诊所对使用x线摄影诊断的骨折患者进行超声检查。我们总共确定了11个需要检查的部位——锁骨、肱骨近端、肘部、前臂、掌骨、上肢手指、胸骨、股骨、胫骨、踝关节和跖骨。检查由一名外科医生和一名放射科医生独立进行,他们在诊所治疗期间随机选择患者。在所有可用的投影中,通过超声检查整个骨骼,寻找骨骼创伤的迹象(皮质碰撞,皮质破裂,骨碎片偏移,烟囱效应或间接迹象,如关节积液)。共检查61例患者,其中女孩24例(39%),男孩37例(61%)。患者平均年龄10岁(1 ~ 17岁)。超声检查和放射检查的总体一致性为94%。超声检查未能显示两处骨折,即腓骨远端骨骺非移位SH II型骨折和指骨远端骨骺非移位SH III型骨折。2例前臂远端可疑骨折经x线检查未见超声检查。随后的x线检查排除了骨折的可能,超声检查结果也正确。超声检查是诊断骨骼创伤的一种有效方法。该检查的估计灵敏度约为97%。我们的结果表明,超声在前臂区域有更大的特异性。与文献一致,超声可以被认为可用于所有检查区域的骨折诊断。在某些地方,它也可以用来测量位移。该研究的弱点是患者数量有限,因此有必要对这些问题进行进一步调查。超声检查似乎是一种有用的筛查方法,骨骼创伤的儿童,作为指征的基础放射检查。这可以帮助减少多达三分之二的放射检查次数,从而减少儿科患者的辐射暴露。需要对这些问题进行进一步的研究,并确定诊断可靠性指标。在研究的第二阶段,我们计划确定所有解剖区域的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。第二个目的是评估外科医生和放射科医生所取得的结果、检查的痛苦程度以及便携式超声设备的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书