The technological dichotomy under debate: The chaînes opératoires of copper metallurgy in the third millennium BC in the Upper Guadalquivir (southern Spain)

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Moisés R. Bayona, Francisco Nocete Calvo
{"title":"The technological dichotomy under debate: The chaînes opératoires of copper metallurgy in the third millennium BC in the Upper Guadalquivir (southern Spain)","authors":"Moisés R. Bayona,&nbsp;Francisco Nocete Calvo","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The interpretation of metallurgy in the so-called <em>Chalcolithic</em> period (late 4th-3rd millennium BC) in the Iberian Peninsula has historically been dominated by a paradigm that attributed to its southern region a secondary, dependent role and an inability that defined it as a simple system with a low degree of specialisation, low production capacity and reduced demand for metals. At the technological level, this model was defined by metallurgical knowledge whose domestic application slowed down its sophistication of its methods and resulted in typological monotony and the continuity, for centuries, of the <em>chaînes opératoires</em> of manufacturing. This led to the postulation of a profound dichotomy between the south-eastern and south-western regions. This article presents a direct refutation of this model through the archaeometallurgical analysis of a corpus of 30 copper products dating from the third millennium BC, recovered from three key sites in the Upper Guadalquivir: Marroquíes Bajos, Las Eras del Alcázar and Castro del Río. By applying an analytical protocol that integrates metallographic microscopy, electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) and <em>Vickers</em> microhardness tests<em>,</em> the <em>operational chain</em> implemented is reconstructed. The results reveal remarkable technological consistency and a total absence of simple manufacturing sequences (smelting and forging). On the contrary, the systematic mastery of complex production processes is evident, with a combination of forging and annealing cycles, representing 100% of the sample. This suggests a sophisticated <em>technological tradition</em> shared throughout the southern peninsula, which forces us to reconsider models of craft specialisation, knowledge transmission and social interaction networks in this period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 105645"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X26000805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interpretation of metallurgy in the so-called Chalcolithic period (late 4th-3rd millennium BC) in the Iberian Peninsula has historically been dominated by a paradigm that attributed to its southern region a secondary, dependent role and an inability that defined it as a simple system with a low degree of specialisation, low production capacity and reduced demand for metals. At the technological level, this model was defined by metallurgical knowledge whose domestic application slowed down its sophistication of its methods and resulted in typological monotony and the continuity, for centuries, of the chaînes opératoires of manufacturing. This led to the postulation of a profound dichotomy between the south-eastern and south-western regions. This article presents a direct refutation of this model through the archaeometallurgical analysis of a corpus of 30 copper products dating from the third millennium BC, recovered from three key sites in the Upper Guadalquivir: Marroquíes Bajos, Las Eras del Alcázar and Castro del Río. By applying an analytical protocol that integrates metallographic microscopy, electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) and Vickers microhardness tests, the operational chain implemented is reconstructed. The results reveal remarkable technological consistency and a total absence of simple manufacturing sequences (smelting and forging). On the contrary, the systematic mastery of complex production processes is evident, with a combination of forging and annealing cycles, representing 100% of the sample. This suggests a sophisticated technological tradition shared throughout the southern peninsula, which forces us to reconsider models of craft specialisation, knowledge transmission and social interaction networks in this period.

Abstract Image

争论中的技术二分法:公元前三千年上瓜达尔基维尔(西班牙南部)铜冶金的cha nes opatoires
在伊比利亚半岛所谓的铜石器时代(公元前4 -3千年晚期),对冶金的解释在历史上一直被一种范式所主导,这种范式将其南部地区归因于次要的、依赖的角色,并将其定义为一个专业化程度低、生产能力低、对金属需求减少的简单系统。在技术层面上,这种模式是由冶金知识定义的,而冶金知识在国内的应用减慢了其方法的复杂性,导致了类型学上的单调,几个世纪以来,制造业的混乱简单加工技术(neneopimatoires)一直保持着连续性。这导致了东南和西南地区之间深刻的二分法的假设。本文通过对从上瓜达尔基维尔的三个关键地点(Marroquíes Bajos, Las Eras del Alcázar和Castro del Río)发现的30个铜制品的考古冶金学分析,直接反驳了这一模型。这些铜制品可追溯到公元前三千年。通过应用集成金相显微镜、电子探针显微分析(EPMA)和维氏显微硬度测试的分析方案,重建了实现的操作链。结果显示显著的技术一致性和完全没有简单的制造程序(冶炼和锻造)。相反,对复杂生产过程的系统掌握是显而易见的,锻造和退火循环的结合,代表了100%的样品。这表明了整个南部半岛共享的复杂技术传统,这迫使我们重新考虑这一时期的工艺专业化、知识传播和社会互动网络模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书