[Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities evaluated by factor analysis as compared with Fourier analysis].

Journal of cardiography Pub Date : 1986-06-01
K Hirota, Y Ikuno, T Nishikimi, T Kawarabayashi, K Murai, M Yasuda, H Oku, K Takeuchi, T Takeda, H Ochi
{"title":"[Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities evaluated by factor analysis as compared with Fourier analysis].","authors":"K Hirota,&nbsp;Y Ikuno,&nbsp;T Nishikimi,&nbsp;T Kawarabayashi,&nbsp;K Murai,&nbsp;M Yasuda,&nbsp;H Oku,&nbsp;K Takeuchi,&nbsp;T Takeda,&nbsp;H Ochi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Factor analysis was applied to multigated cardiac pool scintigraphy to evaluate its ability to detect left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in 35 patients with old myocardial infarction (MI), and in 12 control cases with normal left ventriculography. All cases were also evaluated by conventional Fourier analysis. In most cases with normal left ventriculography, the ventricular and atrial factors were extracted by factor analysis. In cases with MI, the third factor was obtained in the left ventricle corresponding to wall motion abnormality. Each case was scored according to the coincidence of findings of ventriculography and those of factor analysis or Fourier analysis. Scores were recorded for three items; the existence, location, and degree of asynergy. In cases of MI, the detection rate of asynergy was 94% by factor analysis, 83% by Fourier analysis, and the agreement in respect to location was 71% and 66%, respectively. Factor analysis had higher scores than Fourier analysis, but this was not significant. The interobserver error of factor analysis was less than that of Fourier analysis. Factor analysis can display locations and dynamic motion curves of asynergy, and it is regarded as a useful method for detecting and evaluating left ventricular wall motion abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":77734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiography","volume":"16 2","pages":"319-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Factor analysis was applied to multigated cardiac pool scintigraphy to evaluate its ability to detect left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in 35 patients with old myocardial infarction (MI), and in 12 control cases with normal left ventriculography. All cases were also evaluated by conventional Fourier analysis. In most cases with normal left ventriculography, the ventricular and atrial factors were extracted by factor analysis. In cases with MI, the third factor was obtained in the left ventricle corresponding to wall motion abnormality. Each case was scored according to the coincidence of findings of ventriculography and those of factor analysis or Fourier analysis. Scores were recorded for three items; the existence, location, and degree of asynergy. In cases of MI, the detection rate of asynergy was 94% by factor analysis, 83% by Fourier analysis, and the agreement in respect to location was 71% and 66%, respectively. Factor analysis had higher scores than Fourier analysis, but this was not significant. The interobserver error of factor analysis was less than that of Fourier analysis. Factor analysis can display locations and dynamic motion curves of asynergy, and it is regarded as a useful method for detecting and evaluating left ventricular wall motion abnormalities.

[因子分析与傅里叶分析比较左心室壁运动异常]。
采用因子分析方法对35例陈旧性心肌梗死(MI)患者和12例左心室造影正常的对照患者进行多门心池闪烁成像检测左室壁运动异常的能力进行评价。所有病例也通过常规傅里叶分析进行评估。在大多数左心室造影正常的病例中,通过因子分析提取心室和心房因素。在心肌梗死病例中,第三个因素出现在左心室,与壁运动异常相对应。根据脑室造影结果与因子分析或傅里叶分析结果的符合性对每个病例进行评分。记录了三个项目的得分;异步的存在、位置和程度。在MI病例中,因子分析和傅立叶分析对异步性的检出率分别为94%和83%,在位置上的一致性分别为71%和66%。因子分析得分高于傅立叶分析,但差异不显著。因子分析的观察者间误差小于傅里叶分析。因子分析可以显示无能的位置和动态运动曲线,是检测和评价左室壁运动异常的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信