Day-to-day variation of bronchodilatory response to an inhaled beta-2-stimulant in asthmatics.

S Lindgren, B Bake, S Larsson
{"title":"Day-to-day variation of bronchodilatory response to an inhaled beta-2-stimulant in asthmatics.","authors":"S Lindgren,&nbsp;B Bake,&nbsp;S Larsson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of inhaling 0.25 and 2.0 mg of terbutaline sulphate, a beta-2-stimulant, from a metered dose aerosol was studied in five asthmatic patients during two periods of five days each. During the first period, the patients used a good spontaneous inhalation technique; during the second period, the inhalation technique was optimized and controlled. The variation of basal FEV1 and of the increase (delta FEV1) caused by 0.25 mg of inhaled terbutaline was considerable. The effect was only slightly better and the variation only slightly smaller when the controlled inhalation technique was used. The differences were not significant. In individual patients, there was no or negative correlation between delta FEV1 and the corresponding basal FEV1 value. Accordingly, the most commonly used way of expressing delta FEV1 as a percentage of basal FEV1 value was found to be insensitive. Delta FEV1, expressed as a percentage of the maximum available FEV1 increase on the same day after 2.25 mg terbutaline sulphate, was found to be most sensitive. This way of expressing delta FEV1 will increase the possibilities of detecting differences between treatments in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":75642,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire","volume":"23 6","pages":"607-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of inhaling 0.25 and 2.0 mg of terbutaline sulphate, a beta-2-stimulant, from a metered dose aerosol was studied in five asthmatic patients during two periods of five days each. During the first period, the patients used a good spontaneous inhalation technique; during the second period, the inhalation technique was optimized and controlled. The variation of basal FEV1 and of the increase (delta FEV1) caused by 0.25 mg of inhaled terbutaline was considerable. The effect was only slightly better and the variation only slightly smaller when the controlled inhalation technique was used. The differences were not significant. In individual patients, there was no or negative correlation between delta FEV1 and the corresponding basal FEV1 value. Accordingly, the most commonly used way of expressing delta FEV1 as a percentage of basal FEV1 value was found to be insensitive. Delta FEV1, expressed as a percentage of the maximum available FEV1 increase on the same day after 2.25 mg terbutaline sulphate, was found to be most sensitive. This way of expressing delta FEV1 will increase the possibilities of detecting differences between treatments in clinical trials.

哮喘患者吸入β -2兴奋剂后支气管扩张反应的日常变化。
从计量剂量的气雾剂中吸入0.25毫克和2.0毫克特布他林硫酸盐(一种β -2兴奋剂)的效果,在5名哮喘患者中进行了为期5天的两个阶段的研究。在第一阶段,患者使用良好的自主吸入技术;第二阶段对吸入工艺进行优化和控制。吸入0.25 mg特布他林引起的基础FEV1和增量(δ FEV1)变化相当大。当使用控制吸入技术时,效果仅略好,变化仅略小。差异不显著。在个别患者中,δ FEV1与相应的基础FEV1值之间没有或负相关。因此,最常用的表示δ FEV1占基础FEV1值百分比的方法被发现是不敏感的。δ FEV1(以2.25 mg硫酸特布他林后当天最大可用FEV1增加的百分比表示)被发现是最敏感的。这种表达δ FEV1的方法将增加在临床试验中检测治疗之间差异的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信