Comparison of seven coagulase tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 1987-10-01 DOI:10.1007/BF02014257

G Weers-Pothoff, C E Moolhuijzen, G P Bongaerts

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Four coagglutination tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus were compared with the ordinary slide and tube coagulation tests using two groups of staphylococcal strains (one isolated in the authors' laboratory and the other identified by a reference laboratory). The correct identification rate in the two groups was respectively for slide test 96.9% and 92.7%, tube coagulation (citrate plasma) 99.0% and 94.8%, tube coagulation (EDTA plasma) 99.0% and 91.7%, API Staphase III 100% and 91.7%, Staph Rapid 97.9% and 91.3%, Staphyslide 99.0% and 94.6%, Staphaurex 96.9% and 92.7%. The sensitivity of Staph Rapid, Staphyslide and Staphaurex was slightly higher than that of the other tests. These three tests and the slide test were considerably more rapid as regards identification than the other tests.

查看原文本刊更多论文

7种凝固酶检测金黄色葡萄球菌的比较。

采用两组葡萄球菌菌株(一组在作者实验室分离，另一组由参比实验室鉴定)，对鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌的四种凝血试验与普通的玻片和试管凝血试验进行了比较。两组的检出率分别为:玻片法96.9%、92.7%、管凝法(柠檬酸盐血浆)99.0%、94.8%、管凝法(EDTA血浆)99.0%、91.7%、API phase III 100%、91.7%、Staph Rapid 97.9%、91.3%、stapyslide 99.0%、94.6%、Staphaurex 96.9%、92.7%。快速葡萄球菌、葡萄霉素和葡萄球菌的敏感性略高于其他试验。这三个测试和滑动测试在识别方面比其他测试要快得多。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology

自引率

0.00%

发文量