Debt as a US defence spending consideration since the end of World War II. Part One: Truman to Johnson

IF 1.8 Q3 ECONOMICS
David Tier
{"title":"Debt as a US defence spending consideration since the end of World War II. Part One: Truman to Johnson","authors":"David Tier","doi":"10.1111/ecaf.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>US presidents have explicitly addressed trade-offs between adequate military budgets and accruing national debt. Presidents have deliberately considered reductions to defence spending as part of a plan to shrink deficits, but they have also found there is a level of defence spending beneath which they dare not fall. This study reports the results of an examination of primary source documents, speeches, and other records seeking to determine the extent to which presidential administrations considered fiscal balances when making defence spending decisions. Part One addresses the administrations of Presidents Truman through Johnson. Part Two covers Presidents Nixon through Biden. These results inform debates over the US national debt, deficit spending, and the mixtures of spending cuts and revenue increases which are practical to achieve a balanced budget.</p>","PeriodicalId":44825,"journal":{"name":"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS","volume":"45 3","pages":"368-394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecaf.70003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

US presidents have explicitly addressed trade-offs between adequate military budgets and accruing national debt. Presidents have deliberately considered reductions to defence spending as part of a plan to shrink deficits, but they have also found there is a level of defence spending beneath which they dare not fall. This study reports the results of an examination of primary source documents, speeches, and other records seeking to determine the extent to which presidential administrations considered fiscal balances when making defence spending decisions. Part One addresses the administrations of Presidents Truman through Johnson. Part Two covers Presidents Nixon through Biden. These results inform debates over the US national debt, deficit spending, and the mixtures of spending cuts and revenue increases which are practical to achieve a balanced budget.

Abstract Image

自二战结束以来,债务作为美国国防开支的考虑。第一部分:杜鲁门致约翰逊
美国历任总统都明确提出了在充足的军事预算和不断累积的国债之间权衡取舍的问题。总统们有意将削减国防开支作为削减赤字计划的一部分,但他们也发现,国防开支有一个他们不敢低于的水平。本研究报告了对主要原始文件、演讲和其他记录的审查结果,旨在确定总统政府在做出国防开支决定时考虑财政平衡的程度。第一部分讲述了杜鲁门总统到约翰逊总统的政府。第二部分从尼克松总统到拜登总统。这些结果为有关美国国债、赤字支出以及实现预算平衡的实际减支增收组合的辩论提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ECONOMIC AFFAIRS
ECONOMIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Economic Affairs is a journal for those interested in the application of economic principles to practical affairs. It aims to stimulate debate on economic and social problems by asking its authors, while analysing complex issues, to make their analysis and conclusions accessible to a wide audience. Each issue has a theme on which the main articles focus, providing a succinct and up-to-date review of a particular field of applied economics. Themes in 2008 included: New Perspectives on the Economics and Politics of Ageing, Housing for the Poor: the Role of Government, The Economic Analysis of Institutions, and Healthcare: State Failure. Academics are also invited to submit additional articles on subjects related to the coverage of the journal. There is section of double blind refereed articles and a section for shorter pieces that are reviewed by our Editorial Board (Economic Viewpoints). Please contact the editor for full submission details for both sections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信