From Fallen Angels to Bridal Rights: A Historical Journey of Cosmetics in Sacred Traditions and Their Aesthetic Legacy.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Kun Hwang
{"title":"From Fallen Angels to Bridal Rights: A Historical Journey of Cosmetics in Sacred Traditions and Their Aesthetic Legacy.","authors":"Kun Hwang","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cosmetics occupy a paradoxical role in human history, functioning both as sacred instruments of ritual and as contested symbols of vanity and seduction. This paper traces the shifting meanings of cosmetics across mythic, religious, and cultural contexts, with a focus on their enduring legacy. The narrative begins with the Book of Enoch, where the fallen angel Azazel imparts forbidden knowledge of beautification, framing cosmetics as a transgressive act that blurred the boundary between divine order and human artifice. Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean societies, however, incorporated pigments, perfumes, and ointments into religious rites, where adornment symbolized consecration as well as potential corruption. In the Hellenistic period, elite women, particularly in Ptolemaic and Seleucid contexts, wielded cosmetics as expressions of status and cultural agency, despite philosophical critiques that labeled them deceptive. Bridal adornment emerged as a sanctified practice, enshrined in Jewish and early Christian traditions as both a ritual obligation and a symbol of spiritual fidelity. While Church Fathers such as Tertullian condemned cosmetic use, local customs maintained it as an essential expression of purity and joy. These ancient tensions persisted in subsequent religious debates, with rabbinic, Christian, and ascetic authorities negotiating the fine line between sanctification and vanity. Yet many ancient ingredients and ritual practices survive in modern beauty culture, revealing continuity beneath evolving meanings. Ultimately, cosmetics emerge as cultural constants-mutable in interpretation yet enduring in practice-embodying humanity's perennial effort to reconcile bodily fragility with ideals of beauty, power, and transcendence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cosmetics occupy a paradoxical role in human history, functioning both as sacred instruments of ritual and as contested symbols of vanity and seduction. This paper traces the shifting meanings of cosmetics across mythic, religious, and cultural contexts, with a focus on their enduring legacy. The narrative begins with the Book of Enoch, where the fallen angel Azazel imparts forbidden knowledge of beautification, framing cosmetics as a transgressive act that blurred the boundary between divine order and human artifice. Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean societies, however, incorporated pigments, perfumes, and ointments into religious rites, where adornment symbolized consecration as well as potential corruption. In the Hellenistic period, elite women, particularly in Ptolemaic and Seleucid contexts, wielded cosmetics as expressions of status and cultural agency, despite philosophical critiques that labeled them deceptive. Bridal adornment emerged as a sanctified practice, enshrined in Jewish and early Christian traditions as both a ritual obligation and a symbol of spiritual fidelity. While Church Fathers such as Tertullian condemned cosmetic use, local customs maintained it as an essential expression of purity and joy. These ancient tensions persisted in subsequent religious debates, with rabbinic, Christian, and ascetic authorities negotiating the fine line between sanctification and vanity. Yet many ancient ingredients and ritual practices survive in modern beauty culture, revealing continuity beneath evolving meanings. Ultimately, cosmetics emerge as cultural constants-mutable in interpretation yet enduring in practice-embodying humanity's perennial effort to reconcile bodily fragility with ideals of beauty, power, and transcendence.

从堕落天使到新娘权利:化妆品在神圣传统中的历史旅程及其美学遗产。
化妆品在人类历史上扮演着一个矛盾的角色,既是神圣的仪式工具,也是虚荣和诱惑的象征。本文追溯了化妆品在神话、宗教和文化背景下的意义变化,重点是它们的持久遗产。故事从《以诺书》(Book of Enoch)开始,堕落的天使阿撒撒勒(Azazel)传授了关于美化的禁忌知识,将化妆品定义为一种越界行为,模糊了神的秩序和人类技巧之间的界限。然而,古代近东和地中海社会在宗教仪式中加入了颜料、香水和药膏,在那里,装饰象征着奉献和潜在的腐败。在希腊化时期,精英女性,特别是在托勒密和塞琉古时期,使用化妆品作为地位和文化代理的表达,尽管哲学批评称化妆品具有欺骗性。在犹太教和早期基督教的传统中,新娘的装饰成为一种神圣的做法,既是一种仪式义务,也是精神忠诚的象征。虽然像德尔图良这样的教父谴责使用化妆品,但当地的习俗认为这是纯洁和喜悦的基本表达。这些古老的紧张关系在随后的宗教辩论中持续存在,拉比、基督教和禁欲主义当局在圣化和虚荣之间的微妙界限进行谈判。然而,许多古老的成分和仪式实践在现代美容文化中幸存下来,揭示了不断变化的意义下的连续性。最终,化妆品作为一种文化常量出现——在解释上是可变的,但在实践中是持久的——体现了人类长期以来调和身体脆弱与美丽、力量和超越理想的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信