Association between 1-h bundle and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.7
Shukun Hong, Hongye Wang, Jian Liu, Lujun Qiao
{"title":"Association between 1-h bundle and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shukun Hong, Hongye Wang, Jian Liu, Lujun Qiao","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the impact of the 1-h bundle and non-1-h bundle on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies comparing the 1-h and non-1-h bundles in sepsis patient. The search strategy was based on a combination of Medical Subject Heading terms and text words. The primary outcome was short-term mortality, including in-hospital, 28-day, and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies (nine observational, one randomized trial) with 4435 patients were included. Overall mortality rates were 20.8 % in the 1-h bundle group and 24.7 % in the non-1-h bundle group. The meta-analysis showed that the 1-h bundle significantly reduced short-term mortality (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.84). This effect was consistent across single-center (95 % CI 0.67-0.84) and multicenter studies (95 % CI 0.65-0.95). The mortality benefit was also pronounced in prospective studies (95 % CI 0.61-0.86) and ICU settings (95% CI 0.63-0.80), but not in retrospective studies (95 % CI 0.63-1.02) or emergency department settings (95 % CI 0.71-1.05). The limited number of randomized trials resulted in low certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compliance with the 1-h bundle has the potential to reduce short-term mortality in sepsis patients, particularly in ICU settings. High-quality trials are needed to further validate these findings, especially in emergency department settings.</p><p><strong>Implications for clinical practice: </strong>Based on this study, critical care providers, including nurses, should consider implementing the 1-h bundle as part of their standard care protocols for sepsis patients, especially in the ICU. This could lead to improved patient outcomes and reduced mortality. Nurses play a crucial role in the early recognition and management of sepsis, and their adherence to the 1-h bundle can significantly impact patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94043,"journal":{"name":"Intensive & critical care nursing","volume":" ","pages":"104241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive & critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the impact of the 1-h bundle and non-1-h bundle on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.

Methods: PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies comparing the 1-h and non-1-h bundles in sepsis patient. The search strategy was based on a combination of Medical Subject Heading terms and text words. The primary outcome was short-term mortality, including in-hospital, 28-day, and 30-day mortality.

Results: Ten studies (nine observational, one randomized trial) with 4435 patients were included. Overall mortality rates were 20.8 % in the 1-h bundle group and 24.7 % in the non-1-h bundle group. The meta-analysis showed that the 1-h bundle significantly reduced short-term mortality (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.84). This effect was consistent across single-center (95 % CI 0.67-0.84) and multicenter studies (95 % CI 0.65-0.95). The mortality benefit was also pronounced in prospective studies (95 % CI 0.61-0.86) and ICU settings (95% CI 0.63-0.80), but not in retrospective studies (95 % CI 0.63-1.02) or emergency department settings (95 % CI 0.71-1.05). The limited number of randomized trials resulted in low certainty of evidence.

Conclusions: Compliance with the 1-h bundle has the potential to reduce short-term mortality in sepsis patients, particularly in ICU settings. High-quality trials are needed to further validate these findings, especially in emergency department settings.

Implications for clinical practice: Based on this study, critical care providers, including nurses, should consider implementing the 1-h bundle as part of their standard care protocols for sepsis patients, especially in the ICU. This could lead to improved patient outcomes and reduced mortality. Nurses play a crucial role in the early recognition and management of sepsis, and their adherence to the 1-h bundle can significantly impact patient care.

1-h束与脓毒症患者临床结局的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较1-h束和非1-h束对脓毒症患者临床结局的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Ovid、Cochrane Library和Web of Science,找出比较脓毒症患者1-h和非1-h束的研究。搜索策略是基于医学主题标题词和文本词的组合。主要终点是短期死亡率,包括住院死亡率、28天死亡率和30天死亡率。结果:纳入10项研究(9项观察性研究,1项随机试验),4435例患者。1小时束组的总死亡率为20.8%,非1小时束组的总死亡率为24.7%。荟萃分析显示,1-h束显著降低了短期死亡率(95%置信区间[CI] 0.69-0.84)。这种效应在单中心研究(95% CI 0.67-0.84)和多中心研究(95% CI 0.65-0.95)中是一致的。在前瞻性研究(95% CI 0.61-0.86)和ICU环境(95% CI 0.63-0.80)中也有明显的死亡率获益,但在回顾性研究(95% CI 0.63-1.02)或急诊科环境(95% CI 0.71-1.05)中没有。数量有限的随机试验导致证据的低确定性。结论:遵守1-h束有可能降低脓毒症患者的短期死亡率,特别是在ICU环境中。需要高质量的试验来进一步验证这些发现,特别是在急诊科环境中。对临床实践的启示:基于这项研究,重症监护提供者,包括护士,应该考虑实施1-h束作为脓毒症患者标准护理方案的一部分,特别是在ICU。这可能会改善患者的预后并降低死亡率。护士在脓毒症的早期识别和管理中起着至关重要的作用,他们对1-h束的遵守可以显著影响患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信