Importancia de la fase preanalítica de la toma de muestras en la evaluación del proceso de soporte de laboratorio clínico

Q2 Social Sciences
Adolfo Romero-Arana , Jorge Martín-Pereira , Javier Fagundo-Rivera , Juan Gómez-Salgado , Adolfo Romero-Ruiz
{"title":"Importancia de la fase preanalítica de la toma de muestras en la evaluación del proceso de soporte de laboratorio clínico","authors":"Adolfo Romero-Arana ,&nbsp;Jorge Martín-Pereira ,&nbsp;Javier Fagundo-Rivera ,&nbsp;Juan Gómez-Salgado ,&nbsp;Adolfo Romero-Ruiz","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2025.101101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The increasing complexity of the Clinical Laboratory Process and the large number of professionals involved require effective coordination across different levels of care. Given the clinical and economic importance of these processes within the Andalusian healthcare system, this study focuses on analyzing the degree of implementation and quality of the clinical laboratory process in its pre-analytical phase in Primary Care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed using an <em>ad hoc</em> online questionnaire, partially validated through a statistical pilot test. The research was conducted in healthcare centers of the Andalusian public system in the province of Huelva between January and March 2021. A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed, with 223 responses obtained (response rate: 89.2%), and a balanced participation between men (44.8%) and women (55.1%).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The questionnaire showed excellent internal consistency (<em>α</em> &gt; 0.9). A total of 223 questionnaires (89.2%) were completed by professionals from Huelva, mostly women and nurses. In sample collection, the highest-rated item was the staff's legal competence and skills (82.0% rated “excellent”), followed by collection schedules adapted to each center (62.1%). Regarding identification safety, the most notable result was the verification of correspondence between request and patient (65.9%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Protocol adherence was particularly high among primary care professionals, who play a key role in the pre-analytical phase. The study concludes that process standardization is essential to reduce errors, ensure clinical safety, and improve healthcare outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 6","pages":"Article 101101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181325000798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The increasing complexity of the Clinical Laboratory Process and the large number of professionals involved require effective coordination across different levels of care. Given the clinical and economic importance of these processes within the Andalusian healthcare system, this study focuses on analyzing the degree of implementation and quality of the clinical laboratory process in its pre-analytical phase in Primary Care.

Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed using an ad hoc online questionnaire, partially validated through a statistical pilot test. The research was conducted in healthcare centers of the Andalusian public system in the province of Huelva between January and March 2021. A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed, with 223 responses obtained (response rate: 89.2%), and a balanced participation between men (44.8%) and women (55.1%).

Results

The questionnaire showed excellent internal consistency (α > 0.9). A total of 223 questionnaires (89.2%) were completed by professionals from Huelva, mostly women and nurses. In sample collection, the highest-rated item was the staff's legal competence and skills (82.0% rated “excellent”), followed by collection schedules adapted to each center (62.1%). Regarding identification safety, the most notable result was the verification of correspondence between request and patient (65.9%).

Conclusion

Protocol adherence was particularly high among primary care professionals, who play a key role in the pre-analytical phase. The study concludes that process standardization is essential to reduce errors, ensure clinical safety, and improve healthcare outcomes.
分析前取样阶段在评估临床实验室支持过程中的重要性
越来越复杂的临床实验室流程和大量的专业人员需要在不同的护理水平之间进行有效的协调。考虑到安达卢西亚医疗保健系统中这些过程的临床和经济重要性,本研究侧重于分析初级保健前分析阶段临床实验室过程的实施程度和质量。方法采用临时在线问卷设计横断面描述性研究,并通过统计先导检验进行部分验证。该研究于2021年1月至3月在韦尔瓦省安达卢西亚公共系统的医疗中心进行。共发放问卷250份,获得回复223份(回复率89.2%),男性(44.8%)和女性(55.1%)参与均衡。结果问卷具有良好的内部一致性(α >; 0.9)。共有223份问卷(89.2%)由Huelva的专业人员完成,主要是女性和护士。在样本收集中,评价最高的项目是工作人员的法律能力和技能(82.0%的人认为“优秀”),其次是每个中心适应的收集时间表(62.1%)。在识别安全性方面,最显著的结果是验证请求与患者之间的对应关系(65.9%)。结论初级保健专业人员的方案依从性特别高,他们在分析前阶段起着关键作用。该研究得出结论,流程标准化对于减少错误、确保临床安全和改善医疗保健结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信