When and how corporate digital responsibility contributes to a firm's reputation in society: Scale development and structural analysis

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Jawad Abbas
{"title":"When and how corporate digital responsibility contributes to a firm's reputation in society: Scale development and structural analysis","authors":"Jawad Abbas","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital technologies’ use is growing significantly across all industries, highlighting the need for firms to take responsibility in digital environments. Despite their ethical challenges, the scholarly discourse surrounding corporate digital responsibility (CDR) has predominantly neglected a systematic framework. This study tackles the gap by creating a scale for CDR and examines how it relates to firm reputation, thereby significantly advancing the field. The research utilizes data from four surveys carried out in two countries, facilitating the identification of five essential dimensions: data privacy and protection, digital well-being, environmental sustainability, digital inclusion and accessibility, and ethical technology use. These dimensions are assessed using twenty-seven items demonstrating established psychometric reliability. This research revisits essential corporate responsibility frameworks while presenting a novel conceptualization of CDR capabilities, deepening the comprehension of how organizations can engage responsibly within digital environments. The findings highlight the significance of digital accountability and offer a crucial measurement instrument for researchers and practitioners alike. This research enhances the understanding of CDR, enabling managers to refine their organizations' digital practices and ensuring alignment with sustainable and responsible digital behaviors. This study marks a significant advancement in the assessment of CDR, offering considerable opportunities for additional exploration into its various aspects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103067"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500257X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital technologies’ use is growing significantly across all industries, highlighting the need for firms to take responsibility in digital environments. Despite their ethical challenges, the scholarly discourse surrounding corporate digital responsibility (CDR) has predominantly neglected a systematic framework. This study tackles the gap by creating a scale for CDR and examines how it relates to firm reputation, thereby significantly advancing the field. The research utilizes data from four surveys carried out in two countries, facilitating the identification of five essential dimensions: data privacy and protection, digital well-being, environmental sustainability, digital inclusion and accessibility, and ethical technology use. These dimensions are assessed using twenty-seven items demonstrating established psychometric reliability. This research revisits essential corporate responsibility frameworks while presenting a novel conceptualization of CDR capabilities, deepening the comprehension of how organizations can engage responsibly within digital environments. The findings highlight the significance of digital accountability and offer a crucial measurement instrument for researchers and practitioners alike. This research enhances the understanding of CDR, enabling managers to refine their organizations' digital practices and ensuring alignment with sustainable and responsible digital behaviors. This study marks a significant advancement in the assessment of CDR, offering considerable opportunities for additional exploration into its various aspects.
企业数字责任何时以及如何促进企业在社会中的声誉:规模发展和结构分析
数字技术在所有行业的应用都在显著增长,这凸显了企业在数字环境中承担责任的必要性。尽管存在伦理挑战,但围绕企业数字责任(CDR)的学术论述主要忽视了一个系统框架。本研究通过创建CDR量表并研究其与公司声誉的关系来解决这一差距,从而显著推动了该领域的发展。该研究利用了在两个国家开展的四项调查的数据,促进了五个基本维度的确定:数据隐私和保护、数字福祉、环境可持续性、数字包容和可访问性,以及合乎道德的技术使用。这些维度是用27个项目来评估的,证明了建立的心理测量的可靠性。本研究回顾了基本的企业责任框架,同时提出了CDR能力的新概念,加深了对组织如何在数字环境中负责任地参与的理解。研究结果强调了数字问责制的重要性,并为研究人员和从业者提供了一个重要的衡量工具。本研究增强了对CDR的理解,使管理者能够改进其组织的数字实践,并确保与可持续和负责任的数字行为保持一致。本研究标志着CDR评估的重大进展,为进一步探索其各个方面提供了相当大的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信