Objective overall resemblance

Dan Marshall
{"title":"Objective overall resemblance","authors":"Dan Marshall","doi":"10.1007/s44204-025-00327-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What is it for <i>y</i> to be objectively qualitatively overall at least as similar to <i>x</i> as <i>z</i> is? This paper defends a version of the following answer: it is for <i>y</i> to be at least as similar to <i>x</i> as <i>z</i> is in every qualitative respect. On the version defended in this paper, this analysis arguably entails that it is possible for some things to objectively qualitatively resemble each other more than they do other things. However, it also arguably entails that, given how the world contingently is, many things (if not all things) are incomparable in objective qualitative resemblance, where <i>y</i> and <i>z</i> are so incomparable to <i>x</i> iff: (i) it is not the case that <i>y</i> is at least as objectively qualitatively similar to <i>x</i> as <i>z</i> is, and (ii) it is not the case that <i>z</i> is at least as objectively qualitatively similar to <i>x</i> as <i>y</i> is.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-025-00327-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00327-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What is it for y to be objectively qualitatively overall at least as similar to x as z is? This paper defends a version of the following answer: it is for y to be at least as similar to x as z is in every qualitative respect. On the version defended in this paper, this analysis arguably entails that it is possible for some things to objectively qualitatively resemble each other more than they do other things. However, it also arguably entails that, given how the world contingently is, many things (if not all things) are incomparable in objective qualitative resemblance, where y and z are so incomparable to x iff: (i) it is not the case that y is at least as objectively qualitatively similar to x as z is, and (ii) it is not the case that z is at least as objectively qualitatively similar to x as y is.

客观整体相似度
怎样才能使y在客观上总体上至少像z一样与x相似?本文为以下答案的一个版本辩护:y至少在每个定性方面与x相似。在本文所捍卫的版本中,这种分析可能意味着,某些事物在客观上比它们在其他事物上更相似。然而,它也可能意味着,考虑到世界偶然的情况,许多事物(如果不是所有事物)在客观的定性相似性上是不可比较的,其中y和z与x是如此不可比较的:(i) y与x至少不像z在客观上定性相似,(ii) z与x至少不像y在客观上定性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信