Optimizing university restructuring for targeted knowledge output: A preliminary evaluation of Chinese university mergers incorporating preferences

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Jiajia Zhao, Michael Vardanyan, Zhiyang Shen
{"title":"Optimizing university restructuring for targeted knowledge output: A preliminary evaluation of Chinese university mergers incorporating preferences","authors":"Jiajia Zhao, Michael Vardanyan, Zhiyang Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2025.08.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chinese universities have experienced a significant wave of mergers since the late 1990s, raising questions about the impact of such consolidation on the knowledge output efficiency and economies of scale and scope in higher education. In this study, we propose a nonparametric model that takes into account specific output preferences during a preliminary evaluation of merger proposals. Additionally, our model addresses the challenges related to the existence of infeasible solutions that have been highlighted in related literature. Empirical analysis using a sample of Chinese research universities suggests that the current number of universities is below optimal in most provinces regardless of the type of knowledge outcome used to assess university performance. This suggests that further university mergers are unnecessary in these regions. However, multiple beneficial merger scenarios still exist in the provinces of Guizhou and Gansu. In Guizhou, some merger plans could lead to efficiency gains when scholarly publications are used as the knowledge outcome, while in Gansu, several consolidation scenarios show potential gains when research projects serve as outputs. Moreover, we found evidence of widespread diseconomies of scale across most merger scenarios along with relatively modest economies of scope within these two provinces.","PeriodicalId":55161,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Operational Research","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.08.062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chinese universities have experienced a significant wave of mergers since the late 1990s, raising questions about the impact of such consolidation on the knowledge output efficiency and economies of scale and scope in higher education. In this study, we propose a nonparametric model that takes into account specific output preferences during a preliminary evaluation of merger proposals. Additionally, our model addresses the challenges related to the existence of infeasible solutions that have been highlighted in related literature. Empirical analysis using a sample of Chinese research universities suggests that the current number of universities is below optimal in most provinces regardless of the type of knowledge outcome used to assess university performance. This suggests that further university mergers are unnecessary in these regions. However, multiple beneficial merger scenarios still exist in the provinces of Guizhou and Gansu. In Guizhou, some merger plans could lead to efficiency gains when scholarly publications are used as the knowledge outcome, while in Gansu, several consolidation scenarios show potential gains when research projects serve as outputs. Moreover, we found evidence of widespread diseconomies of scale across most merger scenarios along with relatively modest economies of scope within these two provinces.
面向定向知识输出的高校重组优化:我国高校并购偏好的初步评价
自上世纪90年代末以来,中国大学经历了一波重大的合并浪潮,这引发了人们对这种合并对高等教育的知识输出效率、规模经济和范围经济的影响的质疑。在本研究中,我们提出了一个非参数模型,该模型在对合并提议进行初步评估时考虑了具体的产出偏好。此外,我们的模型解决了与相关文献中强调的不可行解决方案存在相关的挑战。以中国研究型大学为样本进行的实证分析表明,无论用于评估大学绩效的知识产出类型如何,目前大多数省份的大学数量都低于最优水平。这表明,这些地区没有必要进一步进行大学合并。然而,贵州和甘肃两省仍然存在多种有利的并购场景。在贵州,当学术出版物被用作知识产出时,一些合并计划可能导致效率的提高,而在甘肃,一些合并方案显示了当研究项目被用作产出时的潜在收益。此外,我们还发现,在这两个省的大多数合并场景中,规模不经济现象普遍存在,而范围经济相对温和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Operational Research
European Journal of Operational Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
786
审稿时长
8.2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) publishes high quality, original papers that contribute to the methodology of operational research (OR) and to the practice of decision making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信