Recent insights on direct democracy: Arguments, drivers, effects and conditions.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.20444.1
Caner Şimşek, João Limão, Inês Campos, Doris Fuchs, Bernd Schlipphak
{"title":"Recent insights on direct democracy: Arguments, drivers, effects and conditions.","authors":"Caner Şimşek, João Limão, Inês Campos, Doris Fuchs, Bernd Schlipphak","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.20444.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rooted in history, with origins tracing back to Athenian democracy in the 5th century BCE, direct democracy has gained renewed attention as a potential solution to the challenges of representative democracy. It is often seen as a means to reduce democratic deficits, enhance citizen participation, and legitimize political decisions. This study reviews recent literature on direct democracy, analyzing 46 articles published between 2016 and 2023 to map key themes and debates. While findings highlight its potential to strengthen participation, empower citizens, and align policies with public preferences, they also emphasize significant risks, including the marginalization of vulnerable groups and susceptibility to elite manipulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"5 ","pages":"171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.20444.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rooted in history, with origins tracing back to Athenian democracy in the 5th century BCE, direct democracy has gained renewed attention as a potential solution to the challenges of representative democracy. It is often seen as a means to reduce democratic deficits, enhance citizen participation, and legitimize political decisions. This study reviews recent literature on direct democracy, analyzing 46 articles published between 2016 and 2023 to map key themes and debates. While findings highlight its potential to strengthen participation, empower citizens, and align policies with public preferences, they also emphasize significant risks, including the marginalization of vulnerable groups and susceptibility to elite manipulation.

直接民主的最新见解:争论、驱动因素、影响和条件。
直接民主植根于历史,其起源可以追溯到公元前5世纪的雅典民主,作为代议制民主挑战的潜在解决方案,它再次受到关注。它通常被视为减少民主赤字、加强公民参与和使政治决策合法化的一种手段。本研究回顾了最近关于直接民主的文献,分析了2016年至2023年间发表的46篇文章,以描绘关键主题和辩论。虽然调查结果强调了它在加强参与、赋予公民权力和使政策与公众偏好保持一致方面的潜力,但它们也强调了重大风险,包括弱势群体被边缘化和容易受到精英操纵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信