EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS IN WISTAR RATS OF BONE GRAFTS PREPARED BY DIFFERENT STERILIZATION METHODS.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-08-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220253303e289865
Pedro Gabriel Minikowski Martins, Luan Praxedes de Oliveira, Thiago Mota Dos Santos, André Vinícius Silva Müller, Erick Leonardo Martins Nascimento, Juliano Valerio Bortolletto
{"title":"EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS IN WISTAR RATS OF BONE GRAFTS PREPARED BY DIFFERENT STERILIZATION METHODS.","authors":"Pedro Gabriel Minikowski Martins, Luan Praxedes de Oliveira, Thiago Mota Dos Santos, André Vinícius Silva Müller, Erick Leonardo Martins Nascimento, Juliano Valerio Bortolletto","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220253303e289865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate <i>in vitro</i> the bone graft preparations sterilization (BG) by freezing, gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide and compare <i>in vivo</i> their osseointegration in Wistar rat femurs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This basic controlled experimental study carried out in two phases, <i>in vitro</i>. First, <i>in vitro</i>, it was evaluated the sterilization of bone allografts exposed to <i>S. aureus</i>, <i>A. baumanii</i>, <i>M. tuberculosis</i> and <i>C. albicans</i>. In the second phase, <i>in vivo</i>, bone allografts osteointegration was compared in thirty-two Wistar rats, separated into four groups. In the control group (CG), fenestrations were carried out in the femur and not given a graft. Other groups received bone allografts prepared by freezing to -70ºC, ethylene oxide and 25KGy gamma irradiation. After thirty days, femurs were histologically evaluated by Hematoxylin-Eosin and Alcian Blue colorations and the Fisher's Exact test was used with p≤0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the <i>in vitro</i> study was observed lower level of decontamination by freezing method (26.6±21.09%) meanwhile and the other methods being 100% efficient. In the <i>in vivo</i> study, we observed no significant differences between the inflammatory reaction, mineralization and osteointegration. The percentage of proteoglycans was higher in the Gamma Irradiation Group and Ethylene Oxide Group. However, there were no significant differences. In the Frozen Graft Group, there was an absence in 37.5% of proteoglycans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preparation of the bone allografts by freezing is less effective than the other methods and there were no differences in the osteointegration of the bone allografts in rat femurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"33 3","pages":"e289865"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220253303e289865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate in vitro the bone graft preparations sterilization (BG) by freezing, gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide and compare in vivo their osseointegration in Wistar rat femurs.

Method: This basic controlled experimental study carried out in two phases, in vitro. First, in vitro, it was evaluated the sterilization of bone allografts exposed to S. aureus, A. baumanii, M. tuberculosis and C. albicans. In the second phase, in vivo, bone allografts osteointegration was compared in thirty-two Wistar rats, separated into four groups. In the control group (CG), fenestrations were carried out in the femur and not given a graft. Other groups received bone allografts prepared by freezing to -70ºC, ethylene oxide and 25KGy gamma irradiation. After thirty days, femurs were histologically evaluated by Hematoxylin-Eosin and Alcian Blue colorations and the Fisher's Exact test was used with p≤0.05.

Results: In the in vitro study was observed lower level of decontamination by freezing method (26.6±21.09%) meanwhile and the other methods being 100% efficient. In the in vivo study, we observed no significant differences between the inflammatory reaction, mineralization and osteointegration. The percentage of proteoglycans was higher in the Gamma Irradiation Group and Ethylene Oxide Group. However, there were no significant differences. In the Frozen Graft Group, there was an absence in 37.5% of proteoglycans.

Conclusion: The preparation of the bone allografts by freezing is less effective than the other methods and there were no differences in the osteointegration of the bone allografts in rat femurs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同灭菌方法对wistar大鼠骨移植的实验分析。
目的:评价冷冻灭菌(BG)、γ辐照灭菌(gamma radiation)和环氧乙烷灭菌(ethylene oxide)三种骨移植制剂的体外效果,并比较其在Wistar大鼠股骨体内的骨整合情况。方法:本实验分两期进行。首先,在体外,评估了暴露于金黄色葡萄球菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、结核分枝杆菌和白色念珠菌的同种异体骨移植物的灭菌效果。第二阶段,将32只Wistar大鼠分为四组,比较同种异体骨移植在体内的骨整合情况。在对照组(CG)中,在股骨内开窗,不给予移植物。其他组采用冷冻至-70℃,环氧乙烷和25KGy γ射线照射制备同种异体骨。30 d后,采用苏木精-伊红和阿利新蓝染色对股骨进行组织学评价,采用Fisher精确检验,p≤0.05。结果:体外实验中,冷冻法的去污率较低(26.6±21.09%),其他方法的去污率为100%。在体内研究中,我们观察到炎症反应、矿化和骨整合之间没有显著差异。γ辐照组和环氧乙烷组的蛋白聚糖百分比较高。然而,没有显著差异。在冷冻移植组中,37.5%的蛋白多糖缺失。结论:冷冻法制备同种异体骨移植体的效果不如其他方法,同种异体骨移植体在大鼠股骨内的骨整合无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信