The Role of Nurse Practitioners in Surgical Settings Across the Perioperative Trajectory: A Comparative Study on Patient-Centered Outcomes.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Limor Chen, Ziv Gil, Nasra Idilbi, Dafna Zontag, Efrat Shadmi
{"title":"The Role of Nurse Practitioners in Surgical Settings Across the Perioperative Trajectory: A Comparative Study on Patient-Centered Outcomes.","authors":"Limor Chen, Ziv Gil, Nasra Idilbi, Dafna Zontag, Efrat Shadmi","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15080291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly integrated into surgical care teams, complementing traditional surgical roles. However, the relationship between their involvement and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as pain and anxiety, remains understudied. <b>Purpose</b>: To examine the types of care from NPs in surgical units during the perioperative period and evaluate their association with length of stay, pain, and anxiety. <b>Methods</b>: Our prospective comparative study in two surgical units at a tertiary medical center included 315 patients: 156 received care from NPs, and 159 received usual care. Data were collected at three time points: post-operative day one (T0), during hospitalization (T1), and 14 days post-discharge (T2). Measures included the Brief Pain Inventory, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and an intervention checklist completed by the NPs. <b>Findings</b>: NPs performed primarily in-hospital interventions including care coordination (40%) and medication management (44%). Patients treated by NPs reported significantly lower in-hospital anxiety compared to usual care (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The length of stay and pain levels were not significantly associated with NP care. <b>Discussion</b>: NPs in surgical settings provide patient-centered care associated with lower in-hospital anxiety. Further research is recommended to validate these findings in diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly integrated into surgical care teams, complementing traditional surgical roles. However, the relationship between their involvement and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as pain and anxiety, remains understudied. Purpose: To examine the types of care from NPs in surgical units during the perioperative period and evaluate their association with length of stay, pain, and anxiety. Methods: Our prospective comparative study in two surgical units at a tertiary medical center included 315 patients: 156 received care from NPs, and 159 received usual care. Data were collected at three time points: post-operative day one (T0), during hospitalization (T1), and 14 days post-discharge (T2). Measures included the Brief Pain Inventory, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and an intervention checklist completed by the NPs. Findings: NPs performed primarily in-hospital interventions including care coordination (40%) and medication management (44%). Patients treated by NPs reported significantly lower in-hospital anxiety compared to usual care (p = 0.001). The length of stay and pain levels were not significantly associated with NP care. Discussion: NPs in surgical settings provide patient-centered care associated with lower in-hospital anxiety. Further research is recommended to validate these findings in diverse settings.

护士从业人员在围手术期手术环境中的作用:一项以患者为中心结果的比较研究。
执业护士(NPs)越来越多地融入外科护理团队,补充了传统的外科角色。然而,他们的参与与患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)之间的关系,如疼痛和焦虑,仍未得到充分研究。目的:研究围手术期手术单位NPs的护理类型,并评估其与住院时间、疼痛和焦虑的关系。方法:我们在一家三级医疗中心的两个外科单位进行前瞻性比较研究,包括315例患者:156例接受NPs护理,159例接受常规护理。在三个时间点收集数据:术后第一天(T0)、住院期间(T1)和出院后14天(T2)。测量方法包括简短疼痛量表、医院焦虑和抑郁量表,以及由NPs完成的干预检查表。结果:NPs主要进行院内干预,包括护理协调(40%)和药物管理(44%)。与常规治疗相比,NPs治疗的患者报告的住院焦虑显著降低(p = 0.001)。住院时间和疼痛程度与NP护理无显著相关。讨论:NPs在外科设置提供患者为中心的护理与较低的院内焦虑。建议进一步研究以在不同环境下验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信