Analysis of outcome of dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft and vaginal wall graft for female urethral stricture.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_121_24
Gaurav Babelay, Ahsan Ahmad, Nikhil Ranjan, Kumar Dheeraj
{"title":"Analysis of outcome of dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft and vaginal wall graft for female urethral stricture.","authors":"Gaurav Babelay, Ahsan Ahmad, Nikhil Ranjan, Kumar Dheeraj","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_121_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It was estimated that 3%-8% of women presented with bladder obstruction, and 4%-13% of these women had female urethral stricture (FUS), which is an uncommon disorder.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study has been conducted to analyze the outcome of Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft (BMG) and vaginal wall graft (VWG) for FUS.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>It was a retrospective, single-centric cohort study. The study has been conducted for 2 years and 2 months, i.e., from July 2021 to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>The study included 20 female patients with urethral stricture who had urethroplasty. The participants were further classified into two groups respectively. One of the groups included 10 participants with cases of BMG urethroplasty and another 10 were cases of VWG urethroplasty.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 program was used to analyze the data. Both continuous and categorical variables were present in the data. Descriptive Statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or <i>n</i> (%) or <i>n</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BMG group had a substantially lower postvoid residual (PVR) of 10 ± 4.2 mL than the VWG group, which had a PVR of 15 ± 6.4 mL with a <i>P</i> = 0.04. The operating time was 110 ± 10.8 in the BMG urethroplasty group and 90 ± 8.2 in the VWG group with a <i>P</i> < 0.001. VWG urethroplasty group. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of AUA symptom score and Q<sub>max</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that FUS reconstruction can offer a good, long-lasting response. Moreover, between both the preferred techniques of BMG and VWG urethroplasty, which is safe and effective, patients with postmenopausal atrophy or vaginal pathology may benefit more from BMG.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 3","pages":"156-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_121_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It was estimated that 3%-8% of women presented with bladder obstruction, and 4%-13% of these women had female urethral stricture (FUS), which is an uncommon disorder.

Aims: The study has been conducted to analyze the outcome of Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft (BMG) and vaginal wall graft (VWG) for FUS.

Settings and design: It was a retrospective, single-centric cohort study. The study has been conducted for 2 years and 2 months, i.e., from July 2021 to September 2023.

Subjects and methods: The study included 20 female patients with urethral stricture who had urethroplasty. The participants were further classified into two groups respectively. One of the groups included 10 participants with cases of BMG urethroplasty and another 10 were cases of VWG urethroplasty.

Statistical analysis: The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 program was used to analyze the data. Both continuous and categorical variables were present in the data. Descriptive Statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or n (%) or n.

Results: The BMG group had a substantially lower postvoid residual (PVR) of 10 ± 4.2 mL than the VWG group, which had a PVR of 15 ± 6.4 mL with a P = 0.04. The operating time was 110 ± 10.8 in the BMG urethroplasty group and 90 ± 8.2 in the VWG group with a P < 0.001. VWG urethroplasty group. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of AUA symptom score and Qmax.

Conclusion: The study concluded that FUS reconstruction can offer a good, long-lasting response. Moreover, between both the preferred techniques of BMG and VWG urethroplasty, which is safe and effective, patients with postmenopausal atrophy or vaginal pathology may benefit more from BMG.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

女性尿道狭窄采用颊黏膜移植与阴道壁移植的背侧尿道成形术疗效分析。
背景:据估计,3%-8%的女性表现为膀胱梗阻,其中4%-13%的女性表现为女性尿道狭窄(FUS),这是一种罕见的疾病。目的:本研究分析了颊粘膜移植物(BMG)和阴道壁移植物(VWG)用于治疗FUS的背侧尿道成形术的效果。背景和设计:这是一项回顾性、单中心队列研究。研究时间为2年零2个月,即从2021年7月至2023年9月。对象和方法:研究对象为20例行尿道成形术的女性尿道狭窄患者。参与者被进一步分为两组。其中一组包括10例BMG尿道成形术患者,另10例VWG尿道成形术患者。统计分析:使用SPSS (Statistical Package for The Social Sciences)第24版程序对数据进行分析。数据中存在连续变量和分类变量。描述性统计以均数±标准差或n(%)或n表示。结果:BMG组空隙后残留(PVR)为10±4.2 mL,明显低于VWG组的15±6.4 mL, P = 0.04。BMG组手术时间为110±10.8,VWG组为90±8.2,P < 0.001。VWG尿道成形术组。两组在AUA症状评分和Qmax方面无统计学差异。结论:研究表明,FUS重建可以提供良好、持久的疗效。此外,在BMG和VWG这两种安全有效的首选技术之间,绝经后萎缩或阴道病变的患者可能从BMG中获益更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信