Analysis of standard aerobic bacterial culture and sensitivity results from three laboratories for canine pyoderma.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
S Zebley, I Spiegel, Z Zhou, S Sanchez
{"title":"Analysis of standard aerobic bacterial culture and sensitivity results from three laboratories for canine pyoderma.","authors":"S Zebley, I Spiegel, Z Zhou, S Sanchez","doi":"10.1111/jsap.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the reported bacteria and antibiotic sensitivities of aerobic bacterial cultures taken from the same lesion and submitted to three different laboratories. The second objective was to evaluate the clinical significance of the results.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three cultures were collected simultaneously from the same lesion (crusts, collarettes or pustules). They were submitted to three laboratories, and the results were analysed. The cultured bacteria and reported sensitivities were compared across the laboratories. Fifteen dogs were included in the study (8 male neutered, 7 female spayed), with an age range of 2 to 17 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 3/14 dogs had total agreement with the bacteria species grown across laboratories; however, the same staphylococcus species was grown in 12/14 dogs. Sensitivity agreement between laboratories was calculated using Cohen's kappa and Fleiss' kappa coefficient when the same bacteria were reported. There was almost perfect agreement of the sensitivity results. Four antibiotics were more likely to have disagreement: gentamicin (40%), doxycycline (26.6%), enrofloxacin (26.6%) and clindamycin (13%).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Staphylococcus species and their sensitivities were reliable and reproducible, which agree with recent studies; however, the additional bacteria reported varied considerably, which may lead to the choice of a broader spectrum antibiotic. To ensure appropriate antibiotic stewardship, all culture results should be compared to cytology results and interpreted with an understanding of the causes of canine pyoderma; any discrepancies should encourage consultation with a microbiologist.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.70018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reported bacteria and antibiotic sensitivities of aerobic bacterial cultures taken from the same lesion and submitted to three different laboratories. The second objective was to evaluate the clinical significance of the results.

Materials and methods: Three cultures were collected simultaneously from the same lesion (crusts, collarettes or pustules). They were submitted to three laboratories, and the results were analysed. The cultured bacteria and reported sensitivities were compared across the laboratories. Fifteen dogs were included in the study (8 male neutered, 7 female spayed), with an age range of 2 to 17 years.

Results: Only 3/14 dogs had total agreement with the bacteria species grown across laboratories; however, the same staphylococcus species was grown in 12/14 dogs. Sensitivity agreement between laboratories was calculated using Cohen's kappa and Fleiss' kappa coefficient when the same bacteria were reported. There was almost perfect agreement of the sensitivity results. Four antibiotics were more likely to have disagreement: gentamicin (40%), doxycycline (26.6%), enrofloxacin (26.6%) and clindamycin (13%).

Clinical significance: Staphylococcus species and their sensitivities were reliable and reproducible, which agree with recent studies; however, the additional bacteria reported varied considerably, which may lead to the choice of a broader spectrum antibiotic. To ensure appropriate antibiotic stewardship, all culture results should be compared to cytology results and interpreted with an understanding of the causes of canine pyoderma; any discrepancies should encourage consultation with a microbiologist.

三个实验室对犬脓皮病的标准需氧细菌培养及敏感性分析。
目的:本研究的目的是评估报告的细菌和抗生素敏感性的有氧细菌培养从同一病变,并提交给三个不同的实验室。第二个目的是评估结果的临床意义。材料与方法:同一病灶(痂、结缔组织或脓疱)同时采集3种培养物。它们被提交给三个实验室,并对结果进行了分析。在实验室中比较了培养的细菌和报告的敏感性。研究共纳入15只犬(8只雄性绝育犬,7只雌性绝育犬),年龄范围为2至17岁。结果:只有3/14只狗与实验室培养的细菌种类完全一致;然而,同样的葡萄球菌在12/14的狗身上生长。当报告相同的细菌时,使用Cohen's kappa和Fleiss' kappa系数计算实验室之间的敏感性一致性。灵敏度结果几乎完全一致。四种抗生素更容易出现分歧:庆大霉素(40%)、强力霉素(26.6%)、恩诺沙星(26.6%)和克林霉素(13%)。临床意义:葡萄球菌种类及其敏感性可靠、可重复性好,与近期研究结果一致;然而,报告的额外细菌差异很大,这可能导致选择更广泛的抗生素。为了确保适当的抗生素管理,所有培养结果应与细胞学结果进行比较,并根据对犬脓皮病病因的理解进行解释;任何差异应鼓励咨询微生物学家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Small Animal Practice
Journal of Small Animal Practice 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery. In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world. The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher. The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信