Joseph M Escandón, Ajani Nugent, Nolan S Karp, Krishna Vyas, Carter J Boyd, Lucas Kreutz-Rodrigues, Oscar J Manrique
{"title":"Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate as a Novel Biomaterial in Personalized Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Joseph M Escandón, Ajani Nugent, Nolan S Karp, Krishna Vyas, Carter J Boyd, Lucas Kreutz-Rodrigues, Oscar J Manrique","doi":"10.3390/jpm15080368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: In the search for optimal meshes and matrices in breast surgery, poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) has emerged as a promising alternative. This review evaluates the clinical application of P4HB scaffolds, focusing on complication rates and surgical outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed and ScienceDirect. Clinical studies assessing perioperative outcomes and complications associated with P4HB scaffolds in breast surgery were included. Results were stratified into aesthetic and reconstructive surgery categories. Meta-analysis was implemented to assess the rate of complications and satisfaction. <b>Results</b>: This systematic review included 13 studies evaluating the use of P4HB scaffold in breast reconstruction (636 cases) and aesthetic breast surgery (462 patients). Breast reconstruction studies were all retrospective, mainly reporting two-stage, prepectoral, immediate reconstructions. Aesthetic studies included both prospective and retrospective designs, with varied implant planes and incision patterns. P4HB use was associated with high satisfaction (95.5%) and favorable outcomes, including lower odds of wound complications (log-OR = -1.135, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Complication rates were low across both surgical categories. P4HB scaffold showed promise in supporting implant-based procedures and maintaining breast shape over time, with minimal increase in surgical time and stable anthropometric measurements. <b>Conclusions</b>: The use of P4HB scaffold in breast reconstruction and aesthetic surgery shows promising results, notably in reducing wound-related complications. Breast reconstruction studies report low complication rates and favorable patient-reported outcomes. In aesthetic procedures, P4HB contributes to improved long-term breast shape and high satisfaction. Despite encouraging findings, further research is necessary to validate long-term efficacy and refine surgical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: In the search for optimal meshes and matrices in breast surgery, poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) has emerged as a promising alternative. This review evaluates the clinical application of P4HB scaffolds, focusing on complication rates and surgical outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed and ScienceDirect. Clinical studies assessing perioperative outcomes and complications associated with P4HB scaffolds in breast surgery were included. Results were stratified into aesthetic and reconstructive surgery categories. Meta-analysis was implemented to assess the rate of complications and satisfaction. Results: This systematic review included 13 studies evaluating the use of P4HB scaffold in breast reconstruction (636 cases) and aesthetic breast surgery (462 patients). Breast reconstruction studies were all retrospective, mainly reporting two-stage, prepectoral, immediate reconstructions. Aesthetic studies included both prospective and retrospective designs, with varied implant planes and incision patterns. P4HB use was associated with high satisfaction (95.5%) and favorable outcomes, including lower odds of wound complications (log-OR = -1.135, p = 0.003). Complication rates were low across both surgical categories. P4HB scaffold showed promise in supporting implant-based procedures and maintaining breast shape over time, with minimal increase in surgical time and stable anthropometric measurements. Conclusions: The use of P4HB scaffold in breast reconstruction and aesthetic surgery shows promising results, notably in reducing wound-related complications. Breast reconstruction studies report low complication rates and favorable patient-reported outcomes. In aesthetic procedures, P4HB contributes to improved long-term breast shape and high satisfaction. Despite encouraging findings, further research is necessary to validate long-term efficacy and refine surgical approaches.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.