The undoing of economic sanctions: Evidence from the Russia–Ukraine conflict

IF 3.4 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Raymond Fisman , Giovanna Marcolongo , Meng Wu
{"title":"The undoing of economic sanctions: Evidence from the Russia–Ukraine conflict","authors":"Raymond Fisman ,&nbsp;Giovanna Marcolongo ,&nbsp;Meng Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the effects of Ukraine’s economic blockade of the anthracite-rich Donbas region, to demonstrate how trade sanctions’ efficacy can be undermined by trade through non-participatory nations. We document that after the blockade was imposed in March 2017, Russia reported a sharp increase in anthracite imports from Ukraine, while Ukraine reported no exports to Russia at all. We interpret this gap in “mirror statistics” as reflecting a shift in Donbas trade through Russia. Concurrently, Ukraine’s anthracite imports from Russia increased sharply (from near-zero), indicating that some of the increased supply of anthracite in Russia was exported back to Ukraine. We provide suggestive evidence that Russian traders benefited from monopsony rents, buying low-priced anthracite from Donbas while Russia sold anthracite to Ukraine at prices comparable to other export markets. Overall, our findings highlight some of the economic and geographic features that may raise the cost and limit the efficacy of sanctions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economics","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 105470"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272725001689","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the effects of Ukraine’s economic blockade of the anthracite-rich Donbas region, to demonstrate how trade sanctions’ efficacy can be undermined by trade through non-participatory nations. We document that after the blockade was imposed in March 2017, Russia reported a sharp increase in anthracite imports from Ukraine, while Ukraine reported no exports to Russia at all. We interpret this gap in “mirror statistics” as reflecting a shift in Donbas trade through Russia. Concurrently, Ukraine’s anthracite imports from Russia increased sharply (from near-zero), indicating that some of the increased supply of anthracite in Russia was exported back to Ukraine. We provide suggestive evidence that Russian traders benefited from monopsony rents, buying low-priced anthracite from Donbas while Russia sold anthracite to Ukraine at prices comparable to other export markets. Overall, our findings highlight some of the economic and geographic features that may raise the cost and limit the efficacy of sanctions.
经济制裁的解除:来自俄乌冲突的证据
我们研究了乌克兰对富含无烟煤的顿巴斯地区进行经济封锁的影响,以证明贸易制裁的效力如何被非参与国的贸易所破坏。我们的文件显示,2017年3月实施封锁后,俄罗斯报告从乌克兰进口无烟煤急剧增加,而乌克兰报告根本没有向俄罗斯出口无烟煤。我们将“镜像统计”中的这一差距解释为反映了顿巴斯通过俄罗斯进行贸易的转变。与此同时,乌克兰从俄罗斯进口的无烟煤急剧增加(从接近于零),这表明俄罗斯增加的无烟煤供应中有一部分被出口回乌克兰。我们提供的证据表明,俄罗斯贸易商受益于垄断租金,从顿巴斯购买低价无烟煤,而俄罗斯以与其他出口市场相当的价格向乌克兰出售无烟煤。总的来说,我们的研究结果突出了一些经济和地理特征,这些特征可能会提高制裁的成本并限制制裁的效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Economics aims to promote original scientific research in the field of public economics, focusing on the utilization of contemporary economic theory and quantitative analysis methodologies. It serves as a platform for the international scholarly community to engage in discussions on public policy matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信