Quality participation of physical activity matters for quality of life and subjective wellbeing in people with disabilities

IF 3.3 2区心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

Psychology of Sport and Exercise Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102976

Chunxiao Li , Justin A. Haegele , Brett Smith

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Martin Ginis (2025) critically examines the inconsistent and often inconclusive evidence on the effects of physical activity (PA) on quality of life (QOL) and subjective well-being (SWB) in people with disabilities. In this article, we build on her arguments by highlighting conceptual ambiguities, methodological limitations, and measurement challenges that have contributed to these inconsistencies. We then evaluate the Quality Participation Model of PA and QOL/SWB as a promising framework that positions quality participation as central to enhancing well-being. Finally, we outline future directions (e.g., construct refinement, technological tailoring, co-produced research, and critical happiness studies) and call for a shift toward inclusive, high-quality PA experiences to realize PA's full potential in disability contexts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

高质量地参加体育活动对残疾人的生活质量和主观幸福感至关重要

Martin Ginis（2025）批判性地研究了身体活动（PA）对残疾人生活质量（QOL）和主观幸福感（SWB）影响的不一致且往往不确定的证据。在这篇文章中，我们通过强调概念上的歧义、方法上的限制和测量上的挑战来建立她的论点，这些都导致了这些不一致。然后，我们评估了PA和QOL/SWB的质量参与模型作为一个有前途的框架，将质量参与定位为提高福祉的核心。最后，我们概述了未来的发展方向（例如，构建精细化、技术定制、联合生产研究和关键幸福研究），并呼吁向包容性、高质量的PA体验转变，以实现PA在残疾背景下的全部潜力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychology of Sport and Exercise 医学-心理学

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

172

审稿时长

69 days

期刊介绍： Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.