Metabolic surgery versus usual care effects on mortality among patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_360_24
Ibrahim Altedlawi Albalawi, Hyder Mirghani
{"title":"Metabolic surgery versus usual care effects on mortality among patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ibrahim Altedlawi Albalawi, Hyder Mirghani","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_360_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although bariatric surgery is recommended for obesity treatment, there is an increasing trend toward comorbidity-related indications. The effects of bariatric surgery on mortality are inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to assess metabolic surgery versus usual care on mortality among patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. we searched six databases for articles comparing bariatric surgery with usual care in terms of mortality. The terms used were bariatric surgery, metabolic surgery, lifestyles, usual care, gastric banding, bypass surgery, biliopancreatic diversion, gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The search engine was set for articles from inception up to June 2024. Out of the 1960 studies retrieved, 1810 were retained after the removal of duplication; from them, 75 full texts were eligible, and only 26 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. The study included 866,159 patients (167,152 patients who underwent bariatric surgery and 699,007 usual care patients) and 91,211 deaths. Mortality was lower among patients with bariatric surgery compared to usual care (3.1% vs. 12.6%), odds ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.58, Chi-square = 1638.20, and <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> for heterogeneity = 99%, and the standard difference = 24. Mortality was higher in bariatric surgery in subgroup meta-analysis on patients with type 2 diabetes (2.6% versus 2.0%), odds ratio, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.42-0.95, Chi-square = 101.04, and <i>P</i> = 0.03 <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> for heterogeneity = 95%, and the standard difference = 5. Bariatric surgery was associated with lower mortality in patients with obesity compared to usual care, but higher mortality in subgroup meta-analysis in type 2 diabetes. Larger, well-controlled trials are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"30 ","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_360_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although bariatric surgery is recommended for obesity treatment, there is an increasing trend toward comorbidity-related indications. The effects of bariatric surgery on mortality are inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to assess metabolic surgery versus usual care on mortality among patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. we searched six databases for articles comparing bariatric surgery with usual care in terms of mortality. The terms used were bariatric surgery, metabolic surgery, lifestyles, usual care, gastric banding, bypass surgery, biliopancreatic diversion, gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The search engine was set for articles from inception up to June 2024. Out of the 1960 studies retrieved, 1810 were retained after the removal of duplication; from them, 75 full texts were eligible, and only 26 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. The study included 866,159 patients (167,152 patients who underwent bariatric surgery and 699,007 usual care patients) and 91,211 deaths. Mortality was lower among patients with bariatric surgery compared to usual care (3.1% vs. 12.6%), odds ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.58, Chi-square = 1638.20, and P < 0.001, I 2 for heterogeneity = 99%, and the standard difference = 24. Mortality was higher in bariatric surgery in subgroup meta-analysis on patients with type 2 diabetes (2.6% versus 2.0%), odds ratio, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.42-0.95, Chi-square = 101.04, and P = 0.03 I 2 for heterogeneity = 95%, and the standard difference = 5. Bariatric surgery was associated with lower mortality in patients with obesity compared to usual care, but higher mortality in subgroup meta-analysis in type 2 diabetes. Larger, well-controlled trials are needed.

代谢手术与常规护理对肥胖和2型糖尿病患者死亡率的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
虽然减肥手术被推荐用于肥胖治疗,但与合并症相关的适应症呈增加趋势。减肥手术对死亡率的影响是不一致的。本荟萃分析旨在评估代谢手术与常规护理对肥胖和2型糖尿病患者死亡率的影响。我们检索了六个数据库,以比较减肥手术与常规护理在死亡率方面的文章。所使用的术语有减肥手术、代谢手术、生活方式、日常护理、胃束带、搭桥手术、胆管分流、胃搭桥、袖式胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃搭桥。该搜索引擎从创立到2024年6月都是为文章设置的。在检索到的1960项研究中,删除重复后保留了1810项;其中,75篇全文符合条件,只有26项研究被纳入最终的荟萃分析。该研究包括866,159名患者(167,152名接受减肥手术的患者和699,007名常规护理患者)和91,211名死亡患者。与常规治疗相比,减肥手术患者的死亡率较低(3.1% vs. 12.6%),优势比= 0.43,95%可信区间(CI)为0.32-0.58,卡方= 1638.20,P < 0.001, I 2表示异质性= 99%,标准差异= 24。在亚组荟萃分析中,2型糖尿病患者的减肥手术死亡率更高(2.6%对2.0%),优势比为0.63,95% CI为0.42-0.95,卡方= 101.04,P = 0.03,异质性= 95%,标准差异= 5。与常规治疗相比,减肥手术与肥胖患者的死亡率较低相关,但在2型糖尿病患者的亚组荟萃分析中,死亡率较高。需要更大规模、控制良好的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信