Georgios Agrotis , Sungmin Woo , Fredrik Jäderling , Stephan Ursprung , Sam J Withey , Andrei S. Purysko , Tristan Barrett , Geert Villeirs , Ivo G. Schoots
{"title":"Radiological T-staging in prostate Cancer: Towards a universal MRI-based scoring system","authors":"Georgios Agrotis , Sungmin Woo , Fredrik Jäderling , Stephan Ursprung , Sam J Withey , Andrei S. Purysko , Tristan Barrett , Geert Villeirs , Ivo G. Schoots","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for local prostate cancer tumor (T) staging. While MRI offers superior anatomical resolution compared to digital rectal examination, its accuracy in distinguishing organ-confined (T2) from locally advanced (T3a) tumors remains low. This narrative review critically examines the current MRI-based T-staging performance, its limitations, and the clinical implications of image scoring systems to assess local tumor extent. We highlight the evolution from qualitative assessments toward semi-quantitative and quantitative systems, each integrating features like tumor capsular contact length, bulging, capsular irregularity, neurovascular bundle asymmetry, and capsular enhancement. Emerging data suggest that tumor volume and curvilinear capsular contact length exhibit high specificity, however, most features lack sufficient sensitivity and inter-reader agreement to independently guide treatment management. We argue for favoring specificity over sensitivity in MRI-based T-staging, considering that false positive MRI readings carry negative side effects for patients following overtreatment. Finally, we propose the development of a universal MRI-based scoring system tailored to clinical relevance, prioritizing reproducible guidance for treatment decisions over traditional staging accuracy. Such a scoring system better aligns with contemporary therapeutic goals, reduces overtreatment with its negative side effects, and facilitates standardized reporting in clinical trials and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 112363"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25004498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for local prostate cancer tumor (T) staging. While MRI offers superior anatomical resolution compared to digital rectal examination, its accuracy in distinguishing organ-confined (T2) from locally advanced (T3a) tumors remains low. This narrative review critically examines the current MRI-based T-staging performance, its limitations, and the clinical implications of image scoring systems to assess local tumor extent. We highlight the evolution from qualitative assessments toward semi-quantitative and quantitative systems, each integrating features like tumor capsular contact length, bulging, capsular irregularity, neurovascular bundle asymmetry, and capsular enhancement. Emerging data suggest that tumor volume and curvilinear capsular contact length exhibit high specificity, however, most features lack sufficient sensitivity and inter-reader agreement to independently guide treatment management. We argue for favoring specificity over sensitivity in MRI-based T-staging, considering that false positive MRI readings carry negative side effects for patients following overtreatment. Finally, we propose the development of a universal MRI-based scoring system tailored to clinical relevance, prioritizing reproducible guidance for treatment decisions over traditional staging accuracy. Such a scoring system better aligns with contemporary therapeutic goals, reduces overtreatment with its negative side effects, and facilitates standardized reporting in clinical trials and practice.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.