Sex differences in the acute effects of cannabis on human cognition: A systematic review

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Justin Matheson , Danial Behzad , Christina Zakala , Thomas Hawken , Bruna Brands , Bernard Le Foll , Christine M. Wickens , Anthony C. Ruocco , Terri Rodak , Patricia Di Ciano
{"title":"Sex differences in the acute effects of cannabis on human cognition: A systematic review","authors":"Justin Matheson ,&nbsp;Danial Behzad ,&nbsp;Christina Zakala ,&nbsp;Thomas Hawken ,&nbsp;Bruna Brands ,&nbsp;Bernard Le Foll ,&nbsp;Christine M. Wickens ,&nbsp;Anthony C. Ruocco ,&nbsp;Terri Rodak ,&nbsp;Patricia Di Ciano","doi":"10.1016/j.yfrne.2025.101215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acute cannabis exposure can transiently impair cognitive performance, increasing the risk of accidental injury and potentially disrupting activities of daily living. Although sex differences in responses to cannabis have been reported, no systematic review has examined whether these extend to acute cognitive effects. Our primary aim was to examine sex differences in the acute effects of cannabis (including isolated delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) on cognition in humans. Our secondary aim was to determine if sex differences in the acute effects of cannabis vary by cognitive domain, route of administration, or dosing paradigm. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across Embase, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Of 1,625 unique records, 169 underwent full-text screening, and 29 studies met inclusion criteria. Six of 29 articles (20.7 %), representing eight of 216 cognitive outcomes (3.7 %), found statistical evidence of sex differences in acute cognitive effects of cannabis/THC. All six found increased effects in female participants in at least one cognitive variable; one study additionally found increased effects in male participants, and one study found divergent cognitive effects in male and female participants. There were no clear patterns by cannabis dosing paradigm, route of administration, or cognitive domain. Overall, we found limited evidence that sex significantly influences the acute cognitive effects of cannabis, though methodological heterogeneity precludes any firm conclusions. Future studies should prioritize the measurement of sex-related factors, such as hormonal modulation of cannabinoid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12469,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101215"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009130222500041X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute cannabis exposure can transiently impair cognitive performance, increasing the risk of accidental injury and potentially disrupting activities of daily living. Although sex differences in responses to cannabis have been reported, no systematic review has examined whether these extend to acute cognitive effects. Our primary aim was to examine sex differences in the acute effects of cannabis (including isolated delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) on cognition in humans. Our secondary aim was to determine if sex differences in the acute effects of cannabis vary by cognitive domain, route of administration, or dosing paradigm. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across Embase, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Of 1,625 unique records, 169 underwent full-text screening, and 29 studies met inclusion criteria. Six of 29 articles (20.7 %), representing eight of 216 cognitive outcomes (3.7 %), found statistical evidence of sex differences in acute cognitive effects of cannabis/THC. All six found increased effects in female participants in at least one cognitive variable; one study additionally found increased effects in male participants, and one study found divergent cognitive effects in male and female participants. There were no clear patterns by cannabis dosing paradigm, route of administration, or cognitive domain. Overall, we found limited evidence that sex significantly influences the acute cognitive effects of cannabis, though methodological heterogeneity precludes any firm conclusions. Future studies should prioritize the measurement of sex-related factors, such as hormonal modulation of cannabinoid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
大麻对人类认知急性效应的性别差异:系统综述
急性大麻暴露可短暂损害认知能力,增加意外伤害的风险,并可能扰乱日常生活活动。虽然对大麻的反应有性别差异的报道,但没有系统的回顾检查这些是否延伸到急性认知影响。我们的主要目的是研究大麻(包括分离的德尔塔-9-四氢大麻酚[THC])对人类认知的急性影响的性别差异。我们的第二个目的是确定大麻急性效应的性别差异是否因认知领域、给药途径或给药模式而异。按照PRISMA的指导方针,我们在Embase、MEDLINE、APA PsycInfo、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。在1,625个独特记录中,169个进行了全文筛选,29个研究符合纳入标准。29篇文章中的6篇(20.7%),代表216项认知结果中的8项(3.7%),发现了大麻/四氢大麻酚在急性认知效果方面存在性别差异的统计证据。所有六项研究都发现,女性参与者至少在一个认知变量上的影响有所增加;一项研究还发现,男性参与者的认知效果会增加,另一项研究发现,男性和女性参与者的认知效果存在差异。大麻给药方式、给药途径或认知领域没有明确的模式。总的来说,我们发现有限的证据表明性别显著影响大麻的急性认知效应,尽管方法的异质性排除了任何确定的结论。未来的研究应优先考虑性别相关因素的测量,如激素调节大麻素的药代动力学和药效学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (FIN) publishes a wide range of informative articles including comprehensive reviews, systematic reviews, opinion pieces, and meta-analyses. While the majority of reviews are invited, we also embrace unsolicited reviews and meta-analyses, as well as proposals for thematic special issues, provided they meet our rigorous quality standards. In addition, we encourage authors to submit commentaries that concisely present fresh ideas or offer further analysis to delve deeper into the implications of an article published in our journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信