Triterpenoid saponins from the seeds of Aralia elata (Miq.) Seem. and their chemotaxonomic significance

IF 2 4区生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology Pub Date : 2025-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2025.105115

Wu-Di Zhai , Wen-Hao Zong , Bo-Yue Xiao , Chen-Yang Liu , Xiao-Ping Zhang , Yan Zhang

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phytochemical research was conducted on the seeds of Aralia elata (Miq.) Seem., resulting in the isolation of twelve compounds. The chemical structures of the compounds were elucidated through spectral analysis, and the obtained nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were systematically compared with published literature values. Among the isolated compounds, compound 1 was an undescribed compound, while compound 6 was isolated for the first time from the genus Aralia. The chemotaxonomic significance was further analyzed and discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

楤木种子中的三萜皂苷（Miq.）似乎。以及它们的化学分类意义

对楤木（Aralia elata）种子进行了植物化学研究。似乎。，分离出12个化合物。通过波谱分析对化合物的化学结构进行了解析，并将得到的核磁共振波谱与已发表的文献值进行了系统比较。其中化合物1为未从该属植物中分离得到，化合物6为首次从该属植物中分离得到。进一步分析和讨论了其化学分类学意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

147

审稿时长

43 days

期刊介绍： Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.