Mobile-manufactured biochar in mine closure, costly yet carbon-negative – A techno-economic and life cycle assessment of growing media value chains

Karri Uotila , Karetta Vikki , Marja Uusitalo , Kimmo Rasa , Ilkka Leinonen , Marleena Hagner
{"title":"Mobile-manufactured biochar in mine closure, costly yet carbon-negative – A techno-economic and life cycle assessment of growing media value chains","authors":"Karri Uotila ,&nbsp;Karetta Vikki ,&nbsp;Marja Uusitalo ,&nbsp;Kimmo Rasa ,&nbsp;Ilkka Leinonen ,&nbsp;Marleena Hagner","doi":"10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This concept case explored a circular bioeconomy-based value chain to produce new high-quality growing media to be used in mine closures. Our specific interest was in the production of biochar from waste wood using the mobile pyrolysis unit and use of biochar as a supplement in mine closure growing media. A life cycle costing (LCC) and environmental impact assessment (LCA) was conducted for the production and value chain of four different growing media solutions based on mixtures of composted sewage sludge (COM), fly ash (ASH), peat, till, and waste-wood-based biochar (BC).</div><div>The application of wood waste biochar to compost-till growing media (10 % by volume) increased the costs by 51–71 % (BC-COM-TILL, €28.60 m<sup>-3</sup>). The most affordable scenario was based on compost, ash and till (€16.76 m<sup>-3</sup>). Environmental impacts were acknowledged in the costs according to their carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>eq) emissions assessed in LCA (€52.56 CO<sub>2</sub>eq t<sup>-1</sup>). Accounting for the long-term carbon storage capabilities of the materials, the emissions were highest in peat and till based solution (74.7 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq m<sup>-3</sup>), and lowest in the most expensive solution with biochar (-49.7 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq m<sup>-3</sup>). The biochar-based solution turned into a carbon sink with negative CO<sub>2</sub>eq emissions.</div><div>The study 1) highlighted the lower emissions of growing medias based on circular bioeconomy-based solutions compared to peat used in the traditional growing media solution; 2) showed that the climate emissions of biochar-based growing media were negative; 3) indicated that the price of biochar-based growing media was high, while suggestions were made to moderate the cost. The positive effects of biochar on the plant growth in mine areas have been documented elsewhere, but not acknowledged in this study’s environmental or economic results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100250,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772801325000417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This concept case explored a circular bioeconomy-based value chain to produce new high-quality growing media to be used in mine closures. Our specific interest was in the production of biochar from waste wood using the mobile pyrolysis unit and use of biochar as a supplement in mine closure growing media. A life cycle costing (LCC) and environmental impact assessment (LCA) was conducted for the production and value chain of four different growing media solutions based on mixtures of composted sewage sludge (COM), fly ash (ASH), peat, till, and waste-wood-based biochar (BC).
The application of wood waste biochar to compost-till growing media (10 % by volume) increased the costs by 51–71 % (BC-COM-TILL, €28.60 m-3). The most affordable scenario was based on compost, ash and till (€16.76 m-3). Environmental impacts were acknowledged in the costs according to their carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) emissions assessed in LCA (€52.56 CO2eq t-1). Accounting for the long-term carbon storage capabilities of the materials, the emissions were highest in peat and till based solution (74.7 kg CO2eq m-3), and lowest in the most expensive solution with biochar (-49.7 kg CO2eq m-3). The biochar-based solution turned into a carbon sink with negative CO2eq emissions.
The study 1) highlighted the lower emissions of growing medias based on circular bioeconomy-based solutions compared to peat used in the traditional growing media solution; 2) showed that the climate emissions of biochar-based growing media were negative; 3) indicated that the price of biochar-based growing media was high, while suggestions were made to moderate the cost. The positive effects of biochar on the plant growth in mine areas have been documented elsewhere, but not acknowledged in this study’s environmental or economic results.
矿山关闭中移动制造的生物炭,成本高昂,但碳负-对不断增长的媒体价值链的技术经济和生命周期评估
这个概念案例探索了基于循环生物经济的价值链,以生产用于矿井闭坑的新型高质量生长介质。我们特别感兴趣的是使用移动热解装置从废木材中生产生物炭,并使用生物炭作为矿井封闭生长介质的补充。对四种不同生长介质解决方案的生产和价值链进行了生命周期成本计算(LCC)和环境影响评估(LCA),这些解决方案基于堆肥污泥(COM)、粉煤灰(ash)、泥炭、till和废木生物炭(BC)的混合物。将木材废生物炭应用于堆肥-耕作生长介质(按体积计算为10%)使成本增加了51 - 71% (BC-COM-TILL, 2860万欧元)。最实惠的方案是基于堆肥、灰烬和肥料(1676万欧元)。根据LCA评估的二氧化碳当量(CO2eq)排放量(€52.56 CO2eq t-1),环境影响在成本中得到确认。考虑到材料的长期碳储存能力,以泥炭和土壤为基础的溶液的排放量最高(74.7 kg CO2eq m-3),而最昂贵的生物炭溶液的排放量最低(-49.7 kg CO2eq m-3)。以生物炭为基础的解决方案变成了二氧化碳排放量为负的碳汇。该研究1)强调了基于循环生物经济的培养基与传统培养基中使用的泥炭相比排放更低;2)生物炭基培养基的气候排放为负;3)指出生物炭基培养基的价格较高,并提出了降低成本的建议。生物炭对矿区植物生长的积极影响在其他地方也有记载,但在本研究的环境或经济结果中没有得到承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信