[Clinical characteristics of whooping cough pneumonia in adults].

Q3 Medicine
Z R Liu, J W Ge, K Kong, G C Lyu, S H Jiang
{"title":"[Clinical characteristics of whooping cough pneumonia in adults].","authors":"Z R Liu, J W Ge, K Kong, G C Lyu, S H Jiang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250117-00147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The data of adult whooping cough pneumonia patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College from January 2023 to December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, and the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was used to analyze the severity of the patients' cough and the decline of their quality of life, and to summarize the clinical manifestation, imaging feature, and bronchoscopic manifestation. A total of 24 adult patients with whooping cough, 13 males and 11 females, aged (56.0±15.9) years, were included, and all of them had cough as the cheif complaint. Using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels, they were divided into the elevated FeNO group [>25 ppb (1 ppb=1×10<sup>-9</sup>)) and the normal FeNO group (5-25 ppb).The total LCQ score of the 24 patients was (10.6±3.1) points. The total LCQ score [(8.9±2.8) vs (12.1±2.5) points] and psychological score [(2.8±1.5) vs (4.5±1.7) points] of females were lower than those of males (all <i>P</i><0.05); the total LCQ score [(8.7±2.3) vs (11.2±3.1) points] and psychological score [(2.6±0.8) vs (4.6±1.6) points] of the FeNO elevation group were lower than those of the FeNO normal group (all <i>P</i><0.05).Chest CT in the 24 patients showed bronchial wall thickening (79.1%, 19/24), patchy infiltrating shadow (54.2%, 13/24), solid lung shadow (45.8%, 11/24), intrapulmonary striated shadow (29.2%, 7/24), and dendritic sign (16.7%, 4/24) and ground glass density shadow (12.5%, 3/24). Bronchoscopy showed mucosal congestion and edema in all cases (100%, 24/24), and in some cases, purulent secretion (66.7%, 16/24), mucus plug (20.8%, 5/24), inflammatory stenosis of the lumen (8.3%, 2/24), mucosal erosions (4.2%, 1/24), and mucosal leukoplakia (4.2%, 1/24). Whooping cough in adults was characterized by cough as the cheif complaint, decreased LCQ score, lower LCQ score in the elevated FeNO group compared to the normal FeNO group, and imaging manifestations of bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and bronchoscopic lesions of varying severity. Adult patients with cough who do not respond well to conventional treatment need to be alerted to pertussis infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"105 30","pages":"2573-2576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250117-00147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The data of adult whooping cough pneumonia patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College from January 2023 to December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, and the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was used to analyze the severity of the patients' cough and the decline of their quality of life, and to summarize the clinical manifestation, imaging feature, and bronchoscopic manifestation. A total of 24 adult patients with whooping cough, 13 males and 11 females, aged (56.0±15.9) years, were included, and all of them had cough as the cheif complaint. Using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels, they were divided into the elevated FeNO group [>25 ppb (1 ppb=1×10-9)) and the normal FeNO group (5-25 ppb).The total LCQ score of the 24 patients was (10.6±3.1) points. The total LCQ score [(8.9±2.8) vs (12.1±2.5) points] and psychological score [(2.8±1.5) vs (4.5±1.7) points] of females were lower than those of males (all P<0.05); the total LCQ score [(8.7±2.3) vs (11.2±3.1) points] and psychological score [(2.6±0.8) vs (4.6±1.6) points] of the FeNO elevation group were lower than those of the FeNO normal group (all P<0.05).Chest CT in the 24 patients showed bronchial wall thickening (79.1%, 19/24), patchy infiltrating shadow (54.2%, 13/24), solid lung shadow (45.8%, 11/24), intrapulmonary striated shadow (29.2%, 7/24), and dendritic sign (16.7%, 4/24) and ground glass density shadow (12.5%, 3/24). Bronchoscopy showed mucosal congestion and edema in all cases (100%, 24/24), and in some cases, purulent secretion (66.7%, 16/24), mucus plug (20.8%, 5/24), inflammatory stenosis of the lumen (8.3%, 2/24), mucosal erosions (4.2%, 1/24), and mucosal leukoplakia (4.2%, 1/24). Whooping cough in adults was characterized by cough as the cheif complaint, decreased LCQ score, lower LCQ score in the elevated FeNO group compared to the normal FeNO group, and imaging manifestations of bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and bronchoscopic lesions of varying severity. Adult patients with cough who do not respond well to conventional treatment need to be alerted to pertussis infection.

[成人百日咳肺炎的临床特点]。
回顾性分析济宁医学院附属医院2023年1月至2024年12月收治的成人百日咳肺炎患者资料,采用莱斯特咳嗽问卷(Leicester cough Questionnaire, LCQ)分析患者咳嗽严重程度及生活质量下降情况,总结其临床表现、影像学特征及支气管镜表现。纳入成人百日咳患者24例,男13例,女11例,年龄(56.0±15.9)岁,均以咳嗽为主诉。根据呼出一氧化氮(FeNO)的分数水平,他们被分为FeNO升高组[bbb25 ppb (1 ppb=1×10-9)]和FeNO正常组(5-25 ppb)。24例患者LCQ总分为(10.6±3.1)分。女性的LCQ总分[(8.9±2.8)分vs(12.1±2.5)分]和心理总分[(2.8±1.5)分vs(4.5±1.7)分]均低于男性(p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信