Impact of bleaching on white spot lesions: hydrogen peroxide permeability and color alteration.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Laryssa Mylenna Madruga Barbosa, Bruno Baracco, Taynara S Carneiro, Michael Willian Favoreto, Michel Wendlinger, Daniel Jiménez-Díez, Laura Ceballos, Alessandro D Loguercio
{"title":"Impact of bleaching on white spot lesions: hydrogen peroxide permeability and color alteration.","authors":"Laryssa Mylenna Madruga Barbosa, Bruno Baracco, Taynara S Carneiro, Michael Willian Favoreto, Michel Wendlinger, Daniel Jiménez-Díez, Laura Ceballos, Alessandro D Loguercio","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06490-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the penetration of hydrogen peroxide (HP) into the pulp chamber and the bleaching efficacy on teeth with white spot lesions (WSLs) compared to sound teeth, when subjected to both in-office and at-home bleaching treatments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty premolars were allocated into four groups (n = 10 each): sound teeth and teeth with artificially induced WSLs, both subjected to at-home bleaching (16% carbamide peroxide) and in-office bleaching (35% hydrogen peroxide). WSLs were induced in half of the specimens using a 14-day pH-cycling protocol alternating between demineralizing and remineralizing solutions. HP permeability (µg/mL) and color parameters (L*, a*, b*, and WI<sub>D</sub>) were quantitatively assessed using a Cary UV-Vis 100 spectrophotometer and a VITA Easyshade Advance 4.0 digital spectrophotometer, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way and three-way ANOVA, with post hoc comparisons by Tukey's, at a significance level of α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WSLs subjected to in-office bleaching exhibited higher HP penetration compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). After bleaching, WSLs showed significantly lower L* and WI<sub>D</sub> values than sound teeth, regardless of the bleaching protocol or time point (p < 0.05). For a*, higher values were observed in WSLs after at-home bleaching, while for b* values no significant differences were found (p > 0.05). No significant difference in WI<sub>D</sub> was observed between bleaching methods for WSLs teeth (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>White spot lesions exhibited greater HP permeability and less favorable optical outcomes compared to sound teeth, particularly after in-office bleaching.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Teeth with white spot lesions are more susceptible to HP diffusion and present less favorable whitening results. At-home bleaching may be a safer and more esthetically favorable conservative treatment option for managing white spot lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 9","pages":"401"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06490-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the penetration of hydrogen peroxide (HP) into the pulp chamber and the bleaching efficacy on teeth with white spot lesions (WSLs) compared to sound teeth, when subjected to both in-office and at-home bleaching treatments.

Materials and methods: Forty premolars were allocated into four groups (n = 10 each): sound teeth and teeth with artificially induced WSLs, both subjected to at-home bleaching (16% carbamide peroxide) and in-office bleaching (35% hydrogen peroxide). WSLs were induced in half of the specimens using a 14-day pH-cycling protocol alternating between demineralizing and remineralizing solutions. HP permeability (µg/mL) and color parameters (L*, a*, b*, and WID) were quantitatively assessed using a Cary UV-Vis 100 spectrophotometer and a VITA Easyshade Advance 4.0 digital spectrophotometer, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way and three-way ANOVA, with post hoc comparisons by Tukey's, at a significance level of α = 0.05.

Results: WSLs subjected to in-office bleaching exhibited higher HP penetration compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). After bleaching, WSLs showed significantly lower L* and WID values than sound teeth, regardless of the bleaching protocol or time point (p < 0.05). For a*, higher values were observed in WSLs after at-home bleaching, while for b* values no significant differences were found (p > 0.05). No significant difference in WID was observed between bleaching methods for WSLs teeth (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: White spot lesions exhibited greater HP permeability and less favorable optical outcomes compared to sound teeth, particularly after in-office bleaching.

Clinical relevance: Teeth with white spot lesions are more susceptible to HP diffusion and present less favorable whitening results. At-home bleaching may be a safer and more esthetically favorable conservative treatment option for managing white spot lesions.

漂白对白斑病变的影响:过氧化氢的渗透性和颜色改变。
目的:评估过氧化氢(HP)进入牙髓腔的渗透程度和对白斑病变牙齿(WSLs)的漂白效果,并与在办公室和在家进行漂白治疗的牙齿进行比较。材料和方法:将40颗前磨牙分为4组(每组10颗):正常牙和人工诱导的牙齿,均进行家庭漂白(16%过氧化脲)和办公室漂白(35%过氧化氢)。使用14天的ph循环方案,在脱矿和再矿溶液之间交替,在一半的标本中诱导WSLs。分别使用Cary UV-Vis 100分光光度计和VITA Easyshade Advance 4.0数字分光光度计定量评估HP渗透率(µg/mL)和颜色参数(L*、a*、b*和WID)。统计学分析采用双因素和三因素方差分析,事后比较采用Tukey’s,显著性水平为α = 0.05。结果:无论漂白方案或时间点如何,与其他组相比,接受办公室漂白的wsl表现出更高的HP渗透(p D值比正常牙齿高(p 0.05)。两种牙齿漂白方法的WID差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:与健康牙齿相比,白斑病变表现出更高的HP渗透性和较差的光学结果,特别是在办公室漂白后。临床意义:有白斑病变的牙齿更容易HP扩散,美白效果较差。家庭漂白可能是一种更安全,更美观的保守治疗选择,以管理白斑病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信