iHOT-12 item analysis: correlations between individual items and overall score within and across time points.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnaf004
Matthew Yuro, Robroy Martin, Andrew B Wolff, Shane Nho, Thomas Wuerz, Geoff Van Thiel, John Christoforetti, John P Salvo, Dean Matsuda, Dominic S Carreira
{"title":"iHOT-12 item analysis: correlations between individual items and overall score within and across time points.","authors":"Matthew Yuro, Robroy Martin, Andrew B Wolff, Shane Nho, Thomas Wuerz, Geoff Van Thiel, John Christoforetti, John P Salvo, Dean Matsuda, Dominic S Carreira","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main aim of this study was to analyze correlations between individual international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT-12) items and overall iHOT-12 score within and across timepoints. A retrospective multicenter hip arthroscopy registry was queried for patients from January 2014 to October 2023 with completed iHOT-12 reports. Pearson coefficient analysis was used to identify correlations between individual iHOT-12 items and overall iHOT-12 score at each timepoint and between preoperative individual iHOT-12 items and postoperative overall iHOT-12 scores. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the iHOT-12 were analyzed at each timepoint. Within timepoints, correlations ranged in strength from fair (preoperative maintain fitness level, <i>r</i> = 0.52, <i>P</i> < .00001) to excellent (5-year hip pain after activity, <i>r</i> = 0.93, <i>P</i> < .00001). Correlations increased in strength over time. Across timepoints, correlations ranged in strength from no correlation (2-year maintain fitness level, <i>r</i> = -0.001, <i>P</i> = 0.94) to poor (6-month pushing or lifting heavy objects, <i>r</i> = 0.31, <i>P</i> < .00001). Correlations decreased in strength over time. No ceiling or floor effects were exhibited. The Cronbach alpha for the baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year timepoints were 0.87, 0.96, 0.95, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. Cohen's <i>d</i> values at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years were 1.19, 1.43, 1.71, and 1.58, respectively. Within timepoints, hip pain after activity had the strongest correlations to overall iHOT-12 score. Across timepoints, correlations between preoperative individual iHOT-12 items and postoperative overall iHOT-12 score were poor and weakened over time, suggesting similar long-term postoperative iHOT-12 scores among both high- and low-scoring preoperative patients. The iHOT-12 demonstrated good validity, reliability, and responsiveness at all timepoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"12 2","pages":"118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnaf004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to analyze correlations between individual international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT-12) items and overall iHOT-12 score within and across timepoints. A retrospective multicenter hip arthroscopy registry was queried for patients from January 2014 to October 2023 with completed iHOT-12 reports. Pearson coefficient analysis was used to identify correlations between individual iHOT-12 items and overall iHOT-12 score at each timepoint and between preoperative individual iHOT-12 items and postoperative overall iHOT-12 scores. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the iHOT-12 were analyzed at each timepoint. Within timepoints, correlations ranged in strength from fair (preoperative maintain fitness level, r = 0.52, P < .00001) to excellent (5-year hip pain after activity, r = 0.93, P < .00001). Correlations increased in strength over time. Across timepoints, correlations ranged in strength from no correlation (2-year maintain fitness level, r = -0.001, P = 0.94) to poor (6-month pushing or lifting heavy objects, r = 0.31, P < .00001). Correlations decreased in strength over time. No ceiling or floor effects were exhibited. The Cronbach alpha for the baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year timepoints were 0.87, 0.96, 0.95, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. Cohen's d values at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years were 1.19, 1.43, 1.71, and 1.58, respectively. Within timepoints, hip pain after activity had the strongest correlations to overall iHOT-12 score. Across timepoints, correlations between preoperative individual iHOT-12 items and postoperative overall iHOT-12 score were poor and weakened over time, suggesting similar long-term postoperative iHOT-12 scores among both high- and low-scoring preoperative patients. The iHOT-12 demonstrated good validity, reliability, and responsiveness at all timepoints.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

iHOT-12项目分析:单个项目与总得分在时间点内和时间点之间的相关性。
本研究的主要目的是分析单个国际髋关节结局工具12 (iHOT-12)项目与iHOT-12总评分在时间点内和时间点之间的相关性。对2014年1月至2023年10月完成iHOT-12报告的患者进行回顾性多中心髋关节镜登记。采用Pearson系数分析确定各时间点iHOT-12单项与iHOT-12总分之间的相关性,以及术前iHOT-12单项与术后iHOT-12总分之间的相关性。在每个时间点分析iHOT-12的有效性、可靠性和响应性。在时间点内,强度的相关性从一般(术前维持健康水平,r = 0.52, P r = 0.93, P r = -0.001, P = 0.94)到较差(6个月推或举重物,r = 0.31, 6个月、1年、2年和5年的P d值分别为1.19、1.43、1.71和1.58。在时间点内,活动后的髋关节疼痛与iHOT-12总分的相关性最强。在各个时间点上,术前个体iHOT-12项目与术后整体iHOT-12评分之间的相关性较差,且随着时间的推移而减弱,表明术前高、低评分患者术后长期iHOT-12评分相似。iHOT-12在所有时间点都表现出良好的有效性、可靠性和响应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信