Assessment of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Score Algorithm for Screening Retinopathy of Prematurity in Premature Infants in Saudi Arabia.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_138_25
L H Raffa, N Bawajeeh, R A Alothman, M Siddiqui, H S Almarzouki
{"title":"Assessment of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Score Algorithm for Screening Retinopathy of Prematurity in Premature Infants in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"L H Raffa, N Bawajeeh, R A Alothman, M Siddiqui, H S Almarzouki","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_138_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) causes blindness among children, particularly preterm infants. While several screening models exist, their performance in developing countries is not well established. This study assessed the accuracy of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia-Retinopathy of Prematurity (CHOP-ROP) in Saudi Arabia and compared it with other models.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the diagnostic performance of the CHOP-ROP model in Saudi preterm infants and compare it with other ROP screening tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involving 524 preterm infants was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in Jeddah. ROP risk was assessed using the CHOP-ROP and compared with four ROP risk models. Predictive values, specificity, sensitivity, and receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed. Logistic regression identified type 1 ROP predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Any-stage ROP was detected in 22.3% of infants; 9.1% required treatment. CHOP-ROP had the highest specificity (62.5%), accuracy (64.2%), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.71), indicating better ability to distinguish infants needing treatment, though its sensitivity was lower (81.4%) than other models. Lower birth weight, longer neonatal intensive care unit stay, and early blood transfusion were significant type 1 ROP predictors (all, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although CHOP-ROP demonstrated strong specificity and accuracy, its lower sensitivity raises concerns about missed cases requiring treatment. Compared to more sensitive local tools, its performance was suboptimal. Region-specific model validation and threshold adjustments are needed to enhance its predictive value while minimizing false negatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":19431,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"28 7","pages":"783-789"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_138_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) causes blindness among children, particularly preterm infants. While several screening models exist, their performance in developing countries is not well established. This study assessed the accuracy of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia-Retinopathy of Prematurity (CHOP-ROP) in Saudi Arabia and compared it with other models.

Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of the CHOP-ROP model in Saudi preterm infants and compare it with other ROP screening tools.

Methods: This retrospective study involving 524 preterm infants was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in Jeddah. ROP risk was assessed using the CHOP-ROP and compared with four ROP risk models. Predictive values, specificity, sensitivity, and receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed. Logistic regression identified type 1 ROP predictors.

Results: Any-stage ROP was detected in 22.3% of infants; 9.1% required treatment. CHOP-ROP had the highest specificity (62.5%), accuracy (64.2%), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.71), indicating better ability to distinguish infants needing treatment, though its sensitivity was lower (81.4%) than other models. Lower birth weight, longer neonatal intensive care unit stay, and early blood transfusion were significant type 1 ROP predictors (all, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Although CHOP-ROP demonstrated strong specificity and accuracy, its lower sensitivity raises concerns about missed cases requiring treatment. Compared to more sensitive local tools, its performance was suboptimal. Region-specific model validation and threshold adjustments are needed to enhance its predictive value while minimizing false negatives.

评估费城儿童医院评分算法筛查早产儿视网膜病变在沙特阿拉伯
背景:早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)会导致儿童失明,尤其是早产儿。虽然存在几种筛选模式,但它们在发展中国家的表现尚未得到很好的确立。本研究评估了沙特阿拉伯费城儿童医院早产儿视网膜病变(CHOP-ROP)模型的准确性,并与其他模型进行了比较。目的:评价CHOP-ROP模型在沙特早产儿中的诊断价值,并与其他ROP筛查工具进行比较。方法:对吉达两所三级医院524例早产儿进行回顾性研究。采用CHOP-ROP评估ROP风险,并与四种ROP风险模型进行比较。分析预测值、特异性、敏感性和受试者工作特征曲线。逻辑回归确定了1型ROP预测因子。结果:22.3%的婴幼儿检出任何阶段ROP;9.1%需要治疗。CHOP-ROP具有最高的特异性(62.5%)、准确性(64.2%)和曲线下面积(AUC)(0.71),虽然其敏感性(81.4%)低于其他模型,但能够更好地区分需要治疗的婴儿。较低的出生体重、较长的新生儿重症监护病房住院时间和早期输血是1型ROP的显著预测因子(均P < 0.05)。结论:虽然CHOP-ROP具有较强的特异性和准确性,但其较低的敏感性引起了人们对漏诊病例需要治疗的担忧。与更敏感的本地工具相比,它的性能不是最优的。特定区域的模型验证和阈值调整需要提高其预测价值,同时最大限度地减少假阴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice is a Monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria. The journal’s full text is available online at www.njcponline.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal makes a token charge for submission, processing and publication of manuscripts including color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信