Assessment of transportation investments feasibility studies with fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making techniques

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Özlem Battal Şal , Mustafa Kürşat Çubuk , Fuat Şimşir
{"title":"Assessment of transportation investments feasibility studies with fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making techniques","authors":"Özlem Battal Şal ,&nbsp;Mustafa Kürşat Çubuk ,&nbsp;Fuat Şimşir","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transportation investments are a unique development tool in the economic growth of countries. This study aims to reveal the importance of feasibility studies in the evaluation of transportation investments in Turkey. A three-stage model was created for this reason in order to assess the studies. Fuzzy logic and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques are combined in the developed model. In Stage 1, criteria and alternatives are determined. In Stage 2, the Best-Worst Method, a weighting method, was used to identify importance levels of the criteria. In Stage 3, a multi-criteria fuzzy evaluation method is suggested by using the weighted criteria fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR methods. There isn't a study that uses MCDM techniques for transportation project feasibility studies. To show how successful the suggested model is, an actual case study was carried out. This study has shown that Financial Feasibility Factors (C7) and Feasibility Factors in Terms of Transportation (C4) are the two most significant criteria, respectively, out of the nine primary criteria that should be included in feasibility studies for transportation projects. Following that, decision-makers ranked the five alternatives according to their preferences after evaluating them using assessment criteria derived from the primary criterion. The suggested approach addresses the impact of the concerns that should be included in the projects on investment decisions and allows for a more thorough examination of feasibility studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101472"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525001877","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transportation investments are a unique development tool in the economic growth of countries. This study aims to reveal the importance of feasibility studies in the evaluation of transportation investments in Turkey. A three-stage model was created for this reason in order to assess the studies. Fuzzy logic and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques are combined in the developed model. In Stage 1, criteria and alternatives are determined. In Stage 2, the Best-Worst Method, a weighting method, was used to identify importance levels of the criteria. In Stage 3, a multi-criteria fuzzy evaluation method is suggested by using the weighted criteria fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR methods. There isn't a study that uses MCDM techniques for transportation project feasibility studies. To show how successful the suggested model is, an actual case study was carried out. This study has shown that Financial Feasibility Factors (C7) and Feasibility Factors in Terms of Transportation (C4) are the two most significant criteria, respectively, out of the nine primary criteria that should be included in feasibility studies for transportation projects. Following that, decision-makers ranked the five alternatives according to their preferences after evaluating them using assessment criteria derived from the primary criterion. The suggested approach addresses the impact of the concerns that should be included in the projects on investment decisions and allows for a more thorough examination of feasibility studies.
基于模糊多准则决策技术的交通投资可行性评价
交通运输投资是各国经济增长中独特的发展工具。本研究旨在揭示可行性研究在土耳其运输投资评估中的重要性。因此,为了评估这些研究,我们创建了一个三阶段模型。该模型将模糊逻辑和多准则决策(MCDM)技术相结合。在第一阶段,确定标准和备选方案。在第二阶段,最佳最差方法,一种加权方法,被用来确定标准的重要性水平。在第三阶段,采用加权标准模糊TOPSIS和模糊VIKOR方法,提出了一种多准则模糊评价方法。目前还没有一项研究将MCDM技术用于交通项目可行性研究。为了证明所建议的模型是多么成功,进行了实际的案例研究。本研究表明,财政可行性因素(C7)和交通运输可行性因素(C4)分别是交通项目可行性研究中应包括的九个主要标准中最重要的两个标准。然后,决策者根据他们的偏好对五个备选方案进行排名,并使用从主要标准衍生出来的评估标准对它们进行评估。建议的办法处理了项目中应包括的问题对投资决定的影响,并允许对可行性研究进行更彻底的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信