Accuracy and Diagnostic Yield of the New AW stereotactic Frame and Its Comparison with The CRW Frame for Brain Biopsy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kugan Vijian, Lau Bik Liang, Donald Ngian San Liew, Zamzuri Idris, Abdul Rahman Izaini Ghani, Jafri Malin Abdullah, Albert Wong Sii Hieng
{"title":"Accuracy and Diagnostic Yield of the New AW stereotactic Frame and Its Comparison with The CRW Frame for Brain Biopsy.","authors":"Kugan Vijian, Lau Bik Liang, Donald Ngian San Liew, Zamzuri Idris, Abdul Rahman Izaini Ghani, Jafri Malin Abdullah, Albert Wong Sii Hieng","doi":"10.3340/jkns.2025.0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Albert-Wong (AW) stereotactic frame for brain biopsy was created by a Malaysian neurosurgeon in 2015. A phantom-based accuracy study demonstrated that its accuracy was non-inferior to well-established stereotactic frames. The objective of our study is to compare the diagnostic yield and accuracy between two stereotactic frame systems: the CRW and AW frame.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. All patients who had undergone frame-based biopsy for intracranial lesions using the CRW or AW frame from the year 2014 to 2022 were included in this study. Sociodemographic details, biopsy characteristics, and histopathological reports were collected, tabulated, and analyzed. A p-value of < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 patients underwent frame-based stereotactic biopsy from January 2014 to January 2022. The CRW frame was used for 19 (50%) of the patients, and the remaining utilized the AW frame. Deep lesions were biopsied in 27 (71%) of the patients, and the overall diagnostic yield was 89.5%. When comparing sociodemography and lesion characteristics between the CRW and AW frame groups, no statistically significant differences were found. The diagnostic yield and accuracy of these frames were 100% vs 84% and 100% vs 90% (AW vs CRW), respectively, with no statistical difference between them (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that biopsies with the AW frame demonstrated diagnostic yield and accuracy which were non-inferior to the older more established frame (CRW).</p>","PeriodicalId":16283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2025.0090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Albert-Wong (AW) stereotactic frame for brain biopsy was created by a Malaysian neurosurgeon in 2015. A phantom-based accuracy study demonstrated that its accuracy was non-inferior to well-established stereotactic frames. The objective of our study is to compare the diagnostic yield and accuracy between two stereotactic frame systems: the CRW and AW frame.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. All patients who had undergone frame-based biopsy for intracranial lesions using the CRW or AW frame from the year 2014 to 2022 were included in this study. Sociodemographic details, biopsy characteristics, and histopathological reports were collected, tabulated, and analyzed. A p-value of < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results: A total of 38 patients underwent frame-based stereotactic biopsy from January 2014 to January 2022. The CRW frame was used for 19 (50%) of the patients, and the remaining utilized the AW frame. Deep lesions were biopsied in 27 (71%) of the patients, and the overall diagnostic yield was 89.5%. When comparing sociodemography and lesion characteristics between the CRW and AW frame groups, no statistically significant differences were found. The diagnostic yield and accuracy of these frames were 100% vs 84% and 100% vs 90% (AW vs CRW), respectively, with no statistical difference between them (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: This study found that biopsies with the AW frame demonstrated diagnostic yield and accuracy which were non-inferior to the older more established frame (CRW).

新AW立体定向框架在脑活检中的准确性和诊断率及其与CRW框架的比较。
目的:Albert-Wong (AW)脑活检立体定向框架由马来西亚神经外科医生于2015年创建。一项基于幻像的精度研究表明,其精度不低于建立立体定向框架。我们研究的目的是比较两种立体定向框架系统:CRW和AW框架的诊断率和准确性。方法:回顾性横断面研究。2014年至2022年间,所有使用CRW或AW框架进行颅内病变框架活检的患者均被纳入本研究。收集社会人口学细节、活检特征和组织病理学报告,制表并分析。p值< 0.05为有统计学意义。结果:2014年1月至2022年1月,共有38例患者接受了基于框架的立体定向活检。19例(50%)患者使用CRW框架,其余患者使用AW框架。27例(71%)患者行深部病变活检,总体诊断率为89.5%。当比较CRW和AW框架组之间的社会人口学和病变特征时,没有发现统计学上的显著差异。这些帧的诊断率和准确率分别为100%对84%和100%对90% (AW vs CRW),两者之间无统计学差异(p > 0.05)。结论:本研究发现AW框架活检的诊断率和准确性不低于较老的更成熟的框架(CRW)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (J Korean Neurosurg Soc) is the official journal of the Korean Neurosurgical Society, and published bimonthly (1st day of January, March, May, July, September, and November). It launched in October 31, 1972 with Volume 1 and Number 1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc aims to allow neurosurgeons from around the world to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism. This journal publishes Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports, Technical Notes, and Letters to the Editor. Our field of interest involves clinical neurosurgery (cerebrovascular disease, neuro-oncology, skull base neurosurgery, spine, pediatric neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, epilepsy, neuro-trauma, and peripheral nerve disease) and laboratory work in neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信