Google's AI co-scientist and OpenAI's deep research: new partners in health research?

Philip Moons, Bei Dou, Chloé Desmedt
{"title":"Google's AI co-scientist and OpenAI's deep research: new partners in health research?","authors":"Philip Moons, Bei Dou, Chloé Desmedt","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In February 2025, Google introduced its artificial intelligence (AI)-powered co-scientist, while OpenAI launched its Deep Research system. Both tools are designed to support researchers by processing extensive scientific literature, extracting key insights, and synthesizing relevant findings. However, critical limitations of these systems are their exclusion of paywalled research, and the inability to distinguish low-quality from high-quality research. This discussion paper highlights the implications of this constraint. Until these AI systems can integrate a more comprehensive range of scientific sources, researchers are advised to rely on well-established AI tools for literature summarization, hypothesis generation, data analysis, and research dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In February 2025, Google introduced its artificial intelligence (AI)-powered co-scientist, while OpenAI launched its Deep Research system. Both tools are designed to support researchers by processing extensive scientific literature, extracting key insights, and synthesizing relevant findings. However, critical limitations of these systems are their exclusion of paywalled research, and the inability to distinguish low-quality from high-quality research. This discussion paper highlights the implications of this constraint. Until these AI systems can integrate a more comprehensive range of scientific sources, researchers are advised to rely on well-established AI tools for literature summarization, hypothesis generation, data analysis, and research dissemination.

b谷歌的人工智能联合科学家和OpenAI的深度研究:健康研究的新合作伙伴?
2025年2月,b谷歌推出了其人工智能(AI)驱动的联合科学家,而OpenAI则推出了其深度研究系统。这两种工具都旨在通过处理广泛的科学文献、提取关键见解和综合相关发现来支持研究人员。然而,这些系统的关键限制是它们排除了付费墙研究,并且无法区分低质量和高质量的研究。本讨论文件强调了这一约束的含义。在这些人工智能系统能够整合更全面的科学来源之前,建议研究人员依靠成熟的人工智能工具进行文献总结、假设生成、数据分析和研究传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信