Pietro Emiliano Doneddu, Giulia Moretti, Vincenzo Di Stefano, Yuri Falzone, Luca Leonardi, Marco Luigetti, Giorgia Mataluni, Luca Gentile, Marinella Carpo, Alessandro Barilaro, Massimiliano Filosto, Elisa Vegezzi, Maurizio Inghilleri, Fabrizio Canale, Filippo Brighina, Sabrina Matà, Adele Ratti, Francesca Forcina, Giovanni Siconolfi, Claudia Lozi, Anna Mazzeo, Ugo Mollo, Barbara Risi, Giuseppe Cosentino, Federica Moret, Carla Fasano, Vincenzo Todisco, Massimo Russo, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio
{"title":"Prevalence of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis in CIDP patients with red flags: a multicenter genetic screening and misdiagnosis analysis.","authors":"Pietro Emiliano Doneddu, Giulia Moretti, Vincenzo Di Stefano, Yuri Falzone, Luca Leonardi, Marco Luigetti, Giorgia Mataluni, Luca Gentile, Marinella Carpo, Alessandro Barilaro, Massimiliano Filosto, Elisa Vegezzi, Maurizio Inghilleri, Fabrizio Canale, Filippo Brighina, Sabrina Matà, Adele Ratti, Francesca Forcina, Giovanni Siconolfi, Claudia Lozi, Anna Mazzeo, Ugo Mollo, Barbara Risi, Giuseppe Cosentino, Federica Moret, Carla Fasano, Vincenzo Todisco, Massimo Russo, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13218-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is a rare, multisystemic disorder often presenting with peripheral neuropathy and can be misdiagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), especially in non-endemic areas. While clinical red flags have been proposed to aid diagnosis, their predictive value remains uncertain. This study prospectively assessed the prevalence of TTR variants in CIDP patients with red flags for ATTRv and retrospectively analyzed features of genetically confirmed ATTRv cases initially misdiagnosed as CIDP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen Italian tertiary neuromuscular centers consecutively screened CIDP patients with at least one red flag for TTR gene variants. A retrospective analysis was also conducted on ATTRv patients initially misdiagnosed as CIDP, comparing clinical, electrophysiological, and treatment response features to confirmed CIDP cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No TTR variants were identified among 124 screened CIDP patients despite 65% presenting with ≥ 2 red flags and 14% not responding to standard therapies. Among 17 retrospectively identified ATTRv patients, 5 (29%) met electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP. In nearly half, CIDP was diagnosed without fulfilling electrodiagnostic criteria or obtaining appropriate supportive investigations. Compared to confirmed CIDP patients, ATTRv cases exhibited significantly more red flags, later onset, more insidious and distal presentations, a progressive course, lower rates of demyelination criteria fulfillment, and no response to immunomodulatory therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Red flags alone have limited predictive value in specialized settings. However, ATTRv should be considered in distal, progressive, treatment-resistant neuropathies, especially with multisystem features. Greater diagnostic rigor and increased awareness in non-specialist settings is essential to reduce misdiagnosis and improve access to therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 8","pages":"515"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13218-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is a rare, multisystemic disorder often presenting with peripheral neuropathy and can be misdiagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), especially in non-endemic areas. While clinical red flags have been proposed to aid diagnosis, their predictive value remains uncertain. This study prospectively assessed the prevalence of TTR variants in CIDP patients with red flags for ATTRv and retrospectively analyzed features of genetically confirmed ATTRv cases initially misdiagnosed as CIDP.
Methods: Thirteen Italian tertiary neuromuscular centers consecutively screened CIDP patients with at least one red flag for TTR gene variants. A retrospective analysis was also conducted on ATTRv patients initially misdiagnosed as CIDP, comparing clinical, electrophysiological, and treatment response features to confirmed CIDP cases.
Results: No TTR variants were identified among 124 screened CIDP patients despite 65% presenting with ≥ 2 red flags and 14% not responding to standard therapies. Among 17 retrospectively identified ATTRv patients, 5 (29%) met electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP. In nearly half, CIDP was diagnosed without fulfilling electrodiagnostic criteria or obtaining appropriate supportive investigations. Compared to confirmed CIDP patients, ATTRv cases exhibited significantly more red flags, later onset, more insidious and distal presentations, a progressive course, lower rates of demyelination criteria fulfillment, and no response to immunomodulatory therapy.
Conclusions: Red flags alone have limited predictive value in specialized settings. However, ATTRv should be considered in distal, progressive, treatment-resistant neuropathies, especially with multisystem features. Greater diagnostic rigor and increased awareness in non-specialist settings is essential to reduce misdiagnosis and improve access to therapy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.