Impact of adjuvant therapy on long-term survival in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma: Insights from a population-based propensity-matched study.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Di Zhang, Yuan Zheng, Jiaoyang Lu
{"title":"Impact of adjuvant therapy on long-term survival in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma: Insights from a population-based propensity-matched study.","authors":"Di Zhang, Yuan Zheng, Jiaoyang Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2025.06.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of adjuvant treatment in resected duodenal adenocarcinoma has not been well established. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) on survival in this rare malignancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with duodenal adenocarcinoma from SEER database between 2004 and 2019 were identified. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify which patient groups benefited from adjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1320 eligible patients, 33.8 % received surgery plus POCT, and 10.8 % received surgery plus POCRT. Compared to surgery alone, POCT significantly improved OS both before and after PSM (P < 0.001). While no significant CSS benefit was observed in the unmatched population, PSM analysis showed improved CSS with POCT (P < 0.001). In contrast, POCRT did not improve OS or CSS, regardless of PSM. Subgroup analyses revealed no survival benefit from POCT in patients younger than 68, those with N0 stage, stage I-II disease, or Black race. POCRT did not significantly improve outcomes in any subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POCT demonstrates a survival benefit in locally advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma, whereas POCRT does not improve outcomes. Patients younger than 68, with N0 stage, stage I-II disease, or of Black race may not benefit from POCT.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>These findings guide clinical decision-making by identifying patient subgroups that benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy while suggesting limited utility for chemoradiotherapy in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive and Liver Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2025.06.024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of adjuvant treatment in resected duodenal adenocarcinoma has not been well established. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) on survival in this rare malignancy.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with duodenal adenocarcinoma from SEER database between 2004 and 2019 were identified. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify which patient groups benefited from adjuvant therapy.

Results: Among the 1320 eligible patients, 33.8 % received surgery plus POCT, and 10.8 % received surgery plus POCRT. Compared to surgery alone, POCT significantly improved OS both before and after PSM (P < 0.001). While no significant CSS benefit was observed in the unmatched population, PSM analysis showed improved CSS with POCT (P < 0.001). In contrast, POCRT did not improve OS or CSS, regardless of PSM. Subgroup analyses revealed no survival benefit from POCT in patients younger than 68, those with N0 stage, stage I-II disease, or Black race. POCRT did not significantly improve outcomes in any subgroup.

Conclusions: POCT demonstrates a survival benefit in locally advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma, whereas POCRT does not improve outcomes. Patients younger than 68, with N0 stage, stage I-II disease, or of Black race may not benefit from POCT.

Impact: These findings guide clinical decision-making by identifying patient subgroups that benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy while suggesting limited utility for chemoradiotherapy in this setting.

辅助治疗对十二指肠腺癌患者长期生存的影响:来自基于人群的倾向匹配研究的见解
背景:辅助治疗在十二指肠腺癌切除术中的疗效尚未得到很好的证实。本研究旨在评估术后化疗(POCT)和术后放化疗(POCT)对这种罕见恶性肿瘤生存的影响。方法:选取2004年至2019年SEER数据库中诊断为十二指肠腺癌的患者。分析倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。进行亚组分析以确定哪些患者组受益于辅助治疗。结果:在1320例符合条件的患者中,33.8%的患者接受了手术+ POCT, 10.8%的患者接受了手术+ POCT。与单纯手术相比,POCT在PSM前后均显著改善OS (P < 0.001)。虽然在未匹配人群中没有观察到显著的CSS获益,但PSM分析显示POCT改善了CSS (P < 0.001)。相比之下,无论PSM如何,POCRT都没有改善OS或CSS。亚组分析显示,年龄小于68岁、0期、I-II期或黑人患者的POCT没有生存益处。POCRT没有显著改善任何亚组的预后。结论:POCT显示局部晚期十二指肠腺癌的生存获益,而POCRT并没有改善预后。年龄小于68岁、0期、I-II期或黑人患者可能无法从POCT中获益。影响:这些发现通过确定从辅助化疗中获益的患者亚组来指导临床决策,同时表明在这种情况下放化疗的效用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive and Liver Disease
Digestive and Liver Disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
632
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Digestive and Liver Disease is an international journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. It is the official journal of Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF); Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP); Italian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SIED); Italian Association for Hospital Gastroenterologists and Digestive Endoscopists (AIGO); Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE); Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology (SIGENP) and Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD). Digestive and Liver Disease publishes papers on basic and clinical research in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. Contributions consist of: Original Papers Correspondence to the Editor Editorials, Reviews and Special Articles Progress Reports Image of the Month Congress Proceedings Symposia and Mini-symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信